American Monsters: Michael Lee Jones
CALL 888-MURDERY, that's, 888-687-3379, to share YOUR Kinda Murdery story or your story of living with a disability or other challenges, and you could inspire an episode of the show!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/kinda-murdery--5496890/support.
Sources:
https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2010/12/vanishing-blonde-201012?redirectURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vanityfair.com%2Fculture%2F2010%2F12%2Fvanishing-blonde-201012 https://www.insideedition.com/how-serial-rapist-was-finally-caught-thanks-suitcase-and-eagle-eyed-private-investigator-51906 https://www.nola.com/news/suitcase-rapist-pleads-guilty-in-new-orleans-and-sentenced-to-45-years/article_dac682b5-3590-5a25-ac1e-63c384ada70f.html
Zevon Odelberg is a true crime podcast host and disability advocate. Zevon has cerebral palsy and he wants Kinda Murdery to be welcoming community for people with disabilities and for people living with challenges of any kind. Life can be hard, but being together makes it better.
Speaker 1: Warning, Kind of Murdery contains adult themes, explicit language, and
Speaker 1: descriptions of violence. It is not suitable for anyone, and
Speaker 1: we recommend you stop listening now.
Speaker 2: True crime with a dash of the paranormal, the garish,
Speaker 2: the strange in the darkly comic. I'm Zeven Odelberg, host
Speaker 2: of kind of Murdery, a podcast that's about more than
Speaker 2: just murder. It's my very own pocket dimension, home to
Speaker 2: a curated collection of bizarre and compelling stories, the unsolved,
Speaker 2: the unsettling, and the unbelievable. I cover it all just
Speaker 2: so long as it's kind of murdery. That's the truth.
Speaker 2: Just like it says in the intro, I am Zeven Odelberg,
Speaker 2: and this is kind of murdery. Hey, my friends, I
Speaker 2: am so glad you are here today. I always do
Speaker 2: appreciate it when you choose to spend time with me.
Speaker 2: It really never gets old. So today I am bringing
Speaker 2: you a humdinger of a mysterious story. I found it.
Speaker 2: The story I found in Vanity Fair, an article called
Speaker 2: The Vanishing Blonde, written by the incredible Mark Bowden. And interestingly,
Speaker 2: it features a real life private eye who we have
Speaker 2: featured before. That is Ken Brennan, if some of you
Speaker 2: will recall the episodes we did on the murder at
Speaker 2: the Hotel Elegante, a story which I also first came
Speaker 2: across in another fantastic article written by the amazing Mark Bowden.
Speaker 2: So if you want to read incredible true crime stories,
Speaker 2: look for just about anything written by Mark Bowden. My
Speaker 2: sources are in the show notes, and I'm not going
Speaker 2: to tell you much about it up front here because
Speaker 2: I'm pretty confident that this is a tale that's going
Speaker 2: to grab you right away. So now, if you are ready,
Speaker 2: please do join me as we uncover what truths we
Speaker 2: can and solve what mysteries we may. Kind of Murdery
Speaker 2: starts now. In the early hours of a chilly winter
Speaker 2: morning in two thousand five, a grim discovery marks the
Speaker 2: beginning of a perplexing case that would haunt the western
Speaker 2: edge of Miami. Amid the liminal space where the orderly
Speaker 2: outer suburbia surrenders to the wild embrace of the Everglades,
Speaker 2: with its towering grass and dark, unforgiving mud. A scene
Speaker 2: unfolds that seems almost too brutal. Two out of place,
Speaker 2: a local power company worker navigating through the routine of
Speaker 2: his day, drives by the desolate expanse of an unbuilt
Speaker 2: cul de sac. It's here, amidst the weeds and solitude
Speaker 2: that he spots something. A young woman only twenty one
Speaker 2: years old with long blonde curls lies faced down. She's naked,
Speaker 2: her body battered, an undeniable sign of the violence she endured.
Speaker 2: She's been discarded here at the very threshold of civilization
Speaker 2: and wilderness. The area, known for its neat grid of
Speaker 2: suburban life, now bears witness to a dark juxtaposition, the
Speaker 2: innocence of the landscape marred by the cruelty inflicted upon
Speaker 2: the woman. Much to the power company worker's surprise, the
Speaker 2: woman is still alive. Rushed to Jackson Memorial Hospital by police,
Speaker 2: she lays unconscious, and then she is airlifted with all
Speaker 2: haste into the expert hands of those who could save her.
Speaker 2: Upon regaining consciousness in the trauma center, her memories of
Speaker 2: the events that led her to the edge of the
Speaker 2: Everglades were fragmented, obscured by the trauma she'd endured. Yet
Speaker 2: her body told a vivid, harrowing story of survival against
Speaker 2: a backdrop of unforgivable violence. She had been subjected to
Speaker 2: a savage assault, raped and beaten with such severity that
Speaker 2: it was miraculous she'd survived. The attackers had not spared her.
Speaker 2: Evidence of their violence was clear, and the severe head
Speaker 2: trauma she suffered with blows forceful enough to rattle her brain.
Speaker 2: Forensic analysis confirmed the assault, with seamen recovered pointing towards
Speaker 2: a heinous act of sexual violence. Her physical injuries were extensive.
Speaker 2: The bones around her right eye were shattered. In the
Speaker 2: midst of her trauma and confusion, her linguistic struggle added
Speaker 2: another layer of complexity to her ordeal. Her accent and
Speaker 2: speech patterns, molded by her native Ukrainian made communication challenging.
Speaker 2: She dropped pronouns, inverted sentence structures. Her English was bent
Speaker 2: around the framework of her mother tongue, rendering her words
Speaker 2: difficult to decipher. Nevertheless, she managed to make one thing
Speaker 2: very clear. As soon as she awoke, the woman asked
Speaker 2: for a lawyer. It was an unusual request, one that
Speaker 2: hinted at a story that would veer far from that
Speaker 2: of ordinary sexual assault. Of course, we should all be
Speaker 2: horrified that there is such a thing as ordinary sexual assault.
Speaker 2: But nonetheless it was uncommon for a victim still in
Speaker 2: the hospital, still suffering horrific injuries, to ask for a lawyer,
Speaker 2: and whatever the woman's reasons, investigators immediately knew that the
Speaker 2: truth behind this case was likely to be an elusive
Speaker 2: and many layered thing. And indeed, as investigators began to
Speaker 2: peel back those very layers, the woman's fragmented memories and
Speaker 2: the physical evidence of her assault would serve as critical
Speaker 2: pieces in unraveling the mystery of exactly what had happened
Speaker 2: to her on that terrible winter morning, Miami Dade detectives
Speaker 2: discovered that the woman had been residing for several months
Speaker 2: at the Airport Regency Hotel, a mere eight miles from
Speaker 2: the desolate spot where she was discovered. The hotel, known
Speaker 2: for its crisp efficiency, was a favorite of business travelers
Speaker 2: navigating long haul flights. The woman was employed by a
Speaker 2: cruise ship line, and her long term stay at the
Speaker 2: hotel was the result of a severe finger injury she
Speaker 2: had sustained on the job. Her recovery was being overseen
Speaker 2: by her employers. As detectives delved deeper, piecing together her
Speaker 2: account of the events leading up to her discovery at
Speaker 2: the Ena, the edge of the Everglades, a bone chilling
Speaker 2: narrative emerged. The assault began in her hotel room on
Speaker 2: the fourth floor. Her attackers, she recalled, were two or
Speaker 2: three white men who spoke with what she perceived to
Speaker 2: be Hispanic accents, though she couldn't be sure. The terrible
Speaker 2: violence of the encounter was punctuated by moments that haunted
Speaker 2: her recovery. The stifling pressure of a pillow forced against
Speaker 2: her face, the bitter taste of the alcohol she was
Speaker 2: forced to consume, fragmented memories of being carried or dragged,
Speaker 2: the cold, physical and spiritual violation within the confines of
Speaker 2: a car's back seat, and her desperate please for mercy.
Speaker 2: These were vivid, traumatic flashes of memory, yet they yielded
Speaker 2: no substantial leads, no clear pathway to identifying her assailants.
Speaker 2: The case took an unexpected turn when the woman's lawyer
Speaker 2: filed a lawsuit against the hotel, citing negligence. The legal
Speaker 2: action sought to hold the establishment accountable, targeting the financial
Speaker 2: depths of its corporate structure. This move raised eyebrows among
Speaker 2: the detectives. The dynamics of the case began to shift,
Speaker 2: prompting them to consider alternative angles. Could there be more
Speaker 2: to the woman's story than met the eye. The typical
Speaker 2: profile of a rape victim seemed to miss align with
Speaker 2: the emerging details of her case. The possibility of a
Speaker 2: sophisticated scam loomed over the investigation, casting a shadow of
Speaker 2: doubt on what had initially appeared to be a straightforward
Speaker 2: case of brutal assault. As the detectives navigated through the
Speaker 2: murky waters of the case, the line between victim and
Speaker 2: participant blurred, challenging their perceptions and compelling them to look
Speaker 2: beyond the surface of the woman's harrowing ordeal. In the
Speaker 2: wake of her brutal assault, Miami Dade Police detectives embarked
Speaker 2: on a meticulous investigation of the Airport Regency Hotel's grounds,
Speaker 2: inside and outside the hotel, the place she had called
Speaker 2: home in the months leading up to the incident. They
Speaker 2: scoured her room for any sign of evidence, conducted interviews
Speaker 2: with hotel staff, and sifted through hours of service Balen's
Speaker 2: footage from the morning of the attack. The detectives also
Speaker 2: scrutinized the guest list, a daunting task given the hotels
Speaker 2: one hundred and seventy four rooms and the transient nature
Speaker 2: of its clientele. However, the sheer volume of the guests
Speaker 2: and the limited resources of a police department stretched thin
Speaker 2: by the demands of a high crime area meant that
Speaker 2: running comprehensive checks on each individual was an impractical, if
Speaker 2: not practically impossible endeavor. As days turned into weeks, the
Speaker 2: investigation found itself mired in a standstill. The sex crimes unit,
Speaker 2: despite their efforts, hit a wall. The absence of clear
Speaker 2: leads or actionable intelligence left them with a case that
Speaker 2: was as perplexing as it was frustrating. Detective Alan Foot,
Speaker 2: who spearheaded the investigation, summed up their predicament with a
Speaker 2: sense of defeat, noticing that their avenues for progress had
Speaker 2: quote dried up. The physical evidence of the assault was
Speaker 2: undeniable and disturbing. The woman had sustained severe head trauma,
Speaker 2: the kind that leaves lasting scars both physical and psychological,
Speaker 2: right was surrounded by shattered bones. Yet with the criminal
Speaker 2: investigation stalled, the pursuit of justice shifted gears, moving from
Speaker 2: the police department's jurisdiction to the civil courts. The hotel
Speaker 2: faced with a lawsuit alleging negligence on their part geared
Speaker 2: up for a legal battle. In a strategic move to
Speaker 2: bolster their defense, the law firm representing the hotel enlisted
Speaker 2: the services of Can Brennan, a private detective. Brennan was
Speaker 2: tasked with a formidable challenge to unravel the mystery that
Speaker 2: so far eluded the police, to piece together the events
Speaker 2: of that fateful morning, and to uncover the truth behind
Speaker 2: the violent assault that had taken place under the roof
Speaker 2: of the Airport Regency Hotel. Detective Allan Foot's initial reaction
Speaker 2: to Can Brennan's involvement was unsurprisingly less than enthusiastic. The
Speaker 2: integration of a private detective into an ongoing case often
Speaker 2: meant unwelcome complications, and Brennan, with his striking presence, was
Speaker 2: no exception. Embodying the quintessential image of a private investigator,
Speaker 2: Brennan was a figure that could easily dominate any ris.
Speaker 2: Middle Aged and deeply tanned, his gray hair and muscular
Speaker 2: physique were complimented by his choice of attire, open necked
Speaker 2: shirts that subtly showcased his strength and a bright, solid
Speaker 2: gold chain that hinted at a life well lived. His
Speaker 2: appearance projected an aura of maturity vitality and success, elements
Speaker 2: that did define both his personal and professional life. Brennan's
Speaker 2: background was as colorful as his personality. He was a
Speaker 2: former cop from Long Island who also boasted experience as
Speaker 2: a dea agent, a role he left in the mid
Speaker 2: nineties to explore new ventures, including commodities brokering and private investigation.
Speaker 2: It was the latter that captured his interest and suited
Speaker 2: his talents. Brennan was known for his warm demeanor and quick,
Speaker 2: accurate assessments of those he encountered, coupled with an unmistakable
Speaker 2: Long Island accent and a straightforward New York attitude. His
Speaker 2: approach to relationships was simple. If he liked you, you'd
Speaker 2: knew it immediately and a long lasting friendship would ensue.
Speaker 2: If not, you'd be equally aware of where you stood.
Speaker 2: Despite his open, engaging personality, Brennan was not one to
Speaker 2: be easily shocked or enticed by the typical fare that
Speaker 2: fills the days of many private detectives. Domestic dispute and
Speaker 2: minor insurance fraud held little interest for him, leading him
Speaker 2: to decline them in favor of more challenging assignments. His
Speaker 2: clientele mainly consisted of businesses and law firms in need
Speaker 2: of someone with a particular skill set to uncover the
Speaker 2: truth in complex civil court cases. This case, with its
Speaker 2: layers of mystery and lack of clear leads, was exactly
Speaker 2: the type of challenge Brennan thrived on as he stepped
Speaker 2: into the fray. His involvement promised to inject new energy
Speaker 2: and perspective into the investigation, potentially steering it in directions
Speaker 2: that the police had not yet explored. Ken Brennan approached
Speaker 2: his work with a principle that set him apart in
Speaker 2: the murky waters of private investigation. His pledge to potential
Speaker 2: clients was unwavering and clear cut. He would commit only
Speaker 2: to uncovering the truth, undistorted by any desire to manipulate
Speaker 2: outcomes in favor of his clients. This integrity was the
Speaker 2: cornerstone of his practice. While the positive impact of his
Speaker 2: findings on clients cases was always welcome, it was never
Speaker 2: his primary motive. Brennan was not in the business of
Speaker 2: strategically winning lawsuits. He was driven by the allure of
Speaker 2: the unknown, the intellectual challenge of piecing together puzzles that
Speaker 2: seemed inscrutable to others. The task at hand in this
Speaker 2: particular investigation was anything but mundane. Brennan was charged with
Speaker 2: untangling the webs surrounding the violent assault of a young woman,
Speaker 2: a case that had left season detective stumped and without leads.
Speaker 2: The questions that needed answers were foundational yet perplexing. Had
Speaker 2: the brutal attack occurred within the hotel or had the
Speaker 2: victim encountered her attacker or attackers elsewhere? What was the
Speaker 2: true nature of the victim's situation. Was she merely an
Speaker 2: innocent cotton a vicious cycle, or was her story intertwined
Speaker 2: with the operations of an Eastern European criminal syndicate. The
Speaker 2: possibility of her involvement in prostitution or being implicated in
Speaker 2: some other manner added layers of confusion and complexity to
Speaker 2: the investigation. Brennan faced a labyrinth of possibilities, each hypothesis
Speaker 2: branching into myriad questions, each as critical as it was challenging.
Speaker 2: The lack of definitive answers and the abundance of speculation
Speaker 2: only served to deepen the intrigue of the case. For Brennan.
Speaker 2: His task was not simply to find the perpetrators, but
Speaker 2: to navigate through the fog of uncertainty and misinformation to
Speaker 2: uncover the reality of what had transpired. This was a
Speaker 2: mystery that promised to test his skills and determination, a
Speaker 2: challenge that Brennan was all too eager to accept. When
Speaker 2: Ken Brennan made his introduction to Detective Allan Foot of
Speaker 2: the Miami Dade Police Sex Crimes Unit, he did so
Speaker 2: with the straightforwardness that comes from shared experience. He believed
Speaker 2: he'd found a kindred spirit in Foot. I used to
Speaker 2: be a cop and a federal agent, Brennan declared, not
Speaker 2: just as an introduction, but as a statement of credibility.
Speaker 2: Foot sizing up, Brennan found himself face to face with
Speaker 2: someone who not only shared his world, but also brought
Speaker 2: an outside perspective that could prove in valielluable. Brennan wasted
Speaker 2: no time in laying out his philosophy, a mix of
Speaker 2: blunt honesty and professional insight. Look, you and I both
Speaker 2: know there's no fucking way you can investigate this case,
Speaker 2: Brennan asserted. His words, far from dismissive, carried a weight
Speaker 2: of understanding, acknowledging the harsh realities of resource constraints and
Speaker 2: the complexities of the investigation. I can see this through
Speaker 2: to the end. I won't step on you, Dick. I
Speaker 2: won't do anything without telling you about it. If I
Speaker 2: figure out who did it, you get the arrest. I
Speaker 2: won't do anything to fuck it up for you. This proposition,
Speaker 2: forthright and devoid of any pretense, resonated with Foot. Here
Speaker 2: was Brennan not just offering to lend his expertise, but
Speaker 2: pledging to navigate the intricacies of the case with respect
Speaker 2: for the detective's role and the police investigation's integrity. Foot,
Speaker 2: confronted with an offer that broke from the usual solitary
Speaker 2: confines of his police work, made an uncharacteristic decision. He
Speaker 2: shared the contents of his file with Brennan, crime scene photos,
Speaker 2: surveillance footage, and the victims fragmented, confused statement interviews with
Speaker 2: the hotel staff. I had led nowhere. They hadn't seen anything,
Speaker 2: and Foot had hit a dead end handing over the information.
Speaker 2: Foot's gesture was one of tacit collaboration, driven perhaps by
Speaker 2: a sense of desperation, but also by a recognition of
Speaker 2: Brennan's potential to make a breakthrough good luck, he thought
Speaker 2: a silent acknowledgment of the daunting task ahead, but also
Speaker 2: a nod to the possibility that Brennan, with his unique
Speaker 2: blend of experience, determination and straightforwardness, might just unravel the
Speaker 2: mystery that had eluded the police. As Ken Brennan delve
Speaker 2: deeper into the case, the previous efforts of an insurance
Speaker 2: adjuster caught his attention. By November two thousand and five,
Speaker 2: eight months since the woman was discovered, the adjuster had
Speaker 2: compiled a detailed summary that Brennan now reviewed with a
Speaker 2: critical eye. The victim's recollections were fragmented and inconsistent, complicating
Speaker 2: the narrative. Initially, she reported a single assailant, but this
Speaker 2: number fluctuated to three, then two, and her description of
Speaker 2: their accents shifted from Hispanic to possibly Romanian. These inconsistencies,
Speaker 2: combined with the lack of concrete evidence, had stymied any
Speaker 2: progress in implicating a suspect. The security infrastructure of the
Speaker 2: Airport Regency hotel where the victim had been staying, presented
Speaker 2: another significant challenge to the solving of the case. The
Speaker 2: property was well protected, surrounded by fencing with locked and
Speaker 2: monitored back gates. Egress was limited to a few points,
Speaker 2: all under strict surveillance. At night, access was further restricted.
Speaker 2: The back door locked, requiring remote opening. Two security guards
Speaker 2: were stationed around the clock, their watchful eyes complemented by
Speaker 2: an array of surveillance cameras covering every potential point of
Speaker 2: injury and exit the front entrance, the back, the lobby,
Speaker 2: the elevator leading from the lobby, and additional areas like
Speaker 2: the pool and parking lot. Moreover, the hotel employed a
Speaker 2: digital key card system for room access, generating a precise
Speaker 2: computer record of each jury and exit. This system theoretically
Speaker 2: enabled the tracking of every guest's movements, offering a potential
Speaker 2: treasure trove of data for someone trying to piece together
Speaker 2: the events of that fateful night. Brennan now faced a
Speaker 2: daunting task. The security measures that should have safeguarded the
Speaker 2: hotel's guests now obscured the sequence of events leading to
Speaker 2: the victim's assault. Each piece of evidence, from the victim's
Speaker 2: fragmented memories to the extensive surveillance footage, seemed to complicate
Speaker 2: the puzzle rather than bring clarity. Yet, for Brennan, these
Speaker 2: obstacles were not deterrence, but challenges to be overcome with
Speaker 2: meticulous attention to detail and a refusal to be swayed
Speaker 2: by dead ends. He was determined to navigate through the
Speaker 2: maze of contradictions and security protocols to uncover the truth.
Speaker 2: Ken Brennan embarked on his investigation with the fundamental question
Speaker 2: that drives all detective work. What did he know for sure?
Speaker 2: He had concrete knowledge that the victim had ascended to
Speaker 2: her room on the fourth floor of the Airport Regency
Speaker 2: Hotel at three forty one a m utilizing her key
Speaker 2: card for injury almost simultaneously, and by dawn she was
Speaker 2: found in the weeds eight miles west of her last
Speaker 2: known location. The mystery centered then on how within this
Speaker 2: approximate three hour window she had managed to leave the
Speaker 2: hotel without any camera evidence capturing her departure. The hotel's
Speaker 2: surveillance system had thoroughly documented the victim's movements throughout the night,
Speaker 2: her bright red puffy jacket and shoulder length blonde curls
Speaker 2: making her a distinct figure against the hotel's backdrop. Her
Speaker 2: restlessness was evident after months of residing at the hotel.
Speaker 2: She frequented the lobby, engaging with staff and guests, stepping
Speaker 2: out for smoke brakes, her movements captured by the vigilant
Speaker 2: eyes of the security cameras. Her night was punctuated by outings,
Speaker 2: including dinner with a friend, returning around midnight, only to
Speaker 2: leave again around three in the morning. The front entrance
Speaker 2: camera recorded her departure in subsequent return following a brief
Speaker 2: trip to a nearby gas station to purchase a phone
Speaker 2: card for a call to her mother in the Ukraine.
Speaker 2: Her re entry into the hotel and her final elevator
Speaker 2: ride upstairs were crucial moments. Notably, a large black man
Speaker 2: entered the elevator with her, engaging in a brief exchange
Speaker 2: captured by the camera. There was a twenty minute gap
Speaker 2: between her entering the elevator and using her key card
Speaker 2: to enter her room, which sparked much speculation, but Brennan
Speaker 2: discovered that the discrepancy was due to the elevator camera's
Speaker 2: clock being out of sync with the computer system tracking
Speaker 2: key card usage. This detail clarified the victim's movements up
Speaker 2: until she entered her room, but beyond that the surveillance
Speaker 2: offered no further insights. Brennan's focus sharpened on the mystery
Speaker 2: of her departure from the hotel. Given the comprehensive coverage
Speaker 2: of the hotel's cameras, the absence of footage showing her
Speaker 2: exit raised questions. Brennan's meticulous review of the surveillance footage
Speaker 2: and the timing discrepancy provided a foundation upon which to
Speaker 2: build his conclusions. With the victim's movements accounted for within
Speaker 2: the hotel, the challenge lay in piecing together how she
Speaker 2: left the premises undetected. Ken Brennan's investigation took him into
Speaker 2: the heart of the mystery. How had the victim left
Speaker 2: the Airport Regency Hotel without a trace on the surveillance cameras.
Speaker 2: The hotel's security system, reliant on motion detectors to a
Speaker 2: activate the cameras, had proven infallible against attempts by the
Speaker 2: Miami Dade detectives to evade detection. Despite their efforts to
Speaker 2: move slowly or from angles they hoped the cameras would
Speaker 2: not cover, the system captured their every move without fail.
Speaker 2: One working hypothesis that the victim may have exited through
Speaker 2: her fourth floor window was meticulously considered and then ultimately dismissed.
Speaker 2: The logistics of lowering an unconscious person from such a
Speaker 2: height without leaving signs of injury on the victim or
Speaker 2: disturbance in the bushes below, defied logic. Even without these
Speaker 2: obvious concerns in regard to the feasibility of this scenario,
Speaker 2: Brennan still found it highly improbable. Acknowledging that sex crimes
Speaker 2: are seldom, if ever, executed with such elaborate coordination and equipment.
Speaker 2: Driven by the conviction that the solution must lay within
Speaker 2: the bounds of the ordinary, Brennan turned his attention back
Speaker 2: to the more plausible route of exit, the elevator to
Speaker 2: the lobby and out through the front door. This path,
Speaker 2: however ordinarya it seemed, presented its own set of challenges
Speaker 2: given the victim's absence from the video record during her
Speaker 2: supposed exit. The case summary by the insurance adjuster underscored
Speaker 2: the mystery, saying, quote needless to say, the big mystery
Speaker 2: here is how this woman got out of the hotel unquote.
Speaker 2: It was a mystery that until now remained unsolved. In
Speaker 2: a moment of insight, Brennan considered a new angle disguise.
Speaker 2: This single word penciled onto a memo opened up a
Speaker 2: new line of inquiry. The premise was simple, yet potentially groundbreaking.
Speaker 2: If the victim had disguised herself or been disguised by
Speaker 2: someone else, it would explain her undetected departure through the
Speaker 2: hotel's surveilled exits. This theory required a thorough re examination
Speaker 2: of the surveillance footage, so Brennan went through it again
Speaker 2: with a keen eye for any details previously overlooked or
Speaker 2: any figures who might not have been given a second glance.
Speaker 2: Ken Brennan's meticulous re examination of the hotel's video surveillance
Speaker 2: transformed into an exhaustive audit of every individual's movements within
Speaker 2: the hotel's confines. His methodical approach involved tracing the journey
Speaker 2: of each person or group from their entrants as captured
Speaker 2: by the camera over the front door, through their progression
Speaker 2: into the lobby, and finally their approach to the elevator.
Speaker 2: The digital breadcrumbs left by the use of room keys
Speaker 2: corroborated these visual records, mapping each guest's injury into their
Speaker 2: respective rooms. A similar reverse sequence accounted for departures, with
Speaker 2: the addition of the parking lot cameras tracking the comings
Speaker 2: and goings of vehicles. Through this relentless scrutiny, Brennan methodically
Speaker 2: narrowed down the list of potential suspects. Criteria for elimination
Speaker 2: were strict and straightforward. Anyone leaving the hotel before the
Speaker 2: victim's last known injury without returning was discounted as a
Speaker 2: possible assailant. Similarly, guests who entered but were not recorded leaving,
Speaker 2: as well as those departing without luggage or with only
Speaker 2: a small bag, were also ruled out. No one was
Speaker 2: exempt from suspicion based on appearance alone. Brennan's keen eye
Speaker 2: also searched for any signs of nervousness or erratic behavior
Speaker 2: that might indicate guilt. This rigorous elimination process ultimately pinpointed
Speaker 2: a singular figure of interest, a very large black man
Speaker 2: with glasses, seen entering the elevator with the victim at
Speaker 2: three forty one am. His stature was imposing, standing at
Speaker 2: least six feet four inches tall and weighing over three
Speaker 2: hundred pounds. The casual exchange between him and the woman
Speaker 2: as they entered the elevator suggested an initial absence of distress. However,
Speaker 2: it was his actions after emerging from the elevator into
Speaker 2: the lobby at five twenty eight am, less than two
Speaker 2: hours later that aroused suspicion. The surveillance footage showed him
Speaker 2: nonchalantly pulling a suitcase with wheels, an item he did
Speaker 2: not possess upon his earlier entry. His departure through the
Speaker 2: front door suitcase in tow, was captured with the same
Speaker 2: casual demeanor. Yet the man's return to the hotel conspicuously
Speaker 2: without the suitcase before dawn raised alarming questions. His re
Speaker 2: entry into the elevator to ascend to the upper floors
Speaker 2: of the hotel was the last piece of visual evidence captured.
Speaker 2: Brennan's focus on this indie visual was not just due
Speaker 2: to his proximity to the victim in the elevator, but
Speaker 2: was reinforced by the sequence of his movements thereafter, particularly
Speaker 2: the mysterious appearance and disappearance of the suitcase. The peculiar
Speaker 2: behavior of the large man hauling a suitcase out of
Speaker 2: the hotel early in the morning, only to return without
Speaker 2: it within the hour sparked a critical realization for Ken Brennan.
Speaker 2: Coupling this observation with his thorough process of elimination, Brennan
Speaker 2: deduced that the victim must have been transported out of
Speaker 2: the hotel concealed within the man's luggage. Initially, the size
Speaker 2: of the suitcase seemed too compact, resembling those typically stored
Speaker 2: in airplane overhead compartments, but this was a deceptive appearance
Speaker 2: given the man's considerable size, Brennan was determined to quantify
Speaker 2: his hypothesis. He meticulously analyzed the surveillance footage, comparing the
Speaker 2: suitcase's dimension against fixed points in the video, such as
Speaker 2: the number of tiles had passed and the height of
Speaker 2: a bar inside the elevator. By obtaining a suitcase masp
Speaker 2: these calculated dimensions a suitcase that was significantly larger than
Speaker 2: it initially appeared on camera, Brennan conducted a stomach churning experiment.
Speaker 2: A flexible young woman mirroring the victim's size, was in
Speaker 2: fact able to fit inside the suitcase, confirming the plausibility,
Speaker 2: or at least executability, of his theory. Further scrutiny of
Speaker 2: the footage revealed a subtle yet telling detail. As the
Speaker 2: man exited the elevator, the suitcase's wheels momentarily snagged on
Speaker 2: the gap between the elevator floor and the lobby. The
Speaker 2: man had to tug slightly to free his luggage. This
Speaker 2: seemingly insignificant moment, easily overlooked by most, revealed something absolutely crucial.
Speaker 2: The suitcase would have to be heavy to get stuck
Speaker 2: like that. A chill ran down Brennan's spine as he
Speaker 2: suddenly realized the truth about his suspect. It was the
Speaker 2: man's demeanor throughout the sequence of events, calmly interacting with
Speaker 2: the victim, effortly navigating the hotel with the Leyden suitcase,
Speaker 2: and casually returning without it. All of this belied the
Speaker 2: horrifying nature and danger inherent to the crime that Brennan
Speaker 2: suspected the man was committing. His composed behavior was starkly
Speaker 2: at odds with the typical disarray observed in individuals involved
Speaker 2: in violent crimes. Brennan, drawing on his extensive experience in
Speaker 2: law enforcement, recognized a chilling proficiency in the suspect's actions.
Speaker 2: The suspect's ability to carry out such a heinous act
Speaker 2: and return to the scene with apparent indifference suggested a
Speaker 2: terrifying level of experience. This man had done this horrible
Speaker 2: thing before. On November seventeen, two thousand and five, Ken
Speaker 2: Brennan orchestrated a crucial meeting at the hotel, gathering the
Speaker 2: executives who had hired him, the hotel owners, insurance adjusters,
Speaker 2: and lawyers. The boardroom, typically a setting for financial deliberations
Speaker 2: in strategic planning, transformed into the stage where Brennan would
Speaker 2: unveil the sinister narrative that had unfolded under their roof.
Speaker 2: Brennan displayed on a laptop screen the pivotal image that
Speaker 2: had guided him to his current conclusions. The large man
Speaker 2: maneuvering his suitcase off the elevator. This is the guy
Speaker 2: that did it. That girls inside the suitcase, Brennan asserted
Speaker 2: with confidence. The reaction was immediate, but not the one
Speaker 2: Brennan had hoped for. Skepticism permeated the room, evidenced by
Speaker 2: snickers and incredulous glances. They were acting like he was crazy.
Speaker 2: How'd you come up with that, someone asked. Undeterred, Brennan
Speaker 2: laid out his methodical approach, detailing the exhaustive process of
Speaker 2: elimination that had narrowed the field of suspects to this
Speaker 2: single individual. Despite his meticulous explanation, the skepticism persisted, compounded
Speaker 2: by the victim's account. Didn't the victim say that she
Speaker 2: was attacked by two white guys? Someone else? Questioned Brennan
Speaker 2: steadfast and his conviction countered. I'm telling you this is
Speaker 2: the guy. Let me run with it a bit. If
Speaker 2: you're willing to give me the resources, I'll track this
Speaker 2: guy down. He framed his request as a mutually benefit
Speaker 2: official proposition, emphasizing the potential to significantly mitigate the hotel's
Speaker 2: liability in the ongoing civil suit by proving the assailant
Speaker 2: was not an employee. What could be better, he argued,
Speaker 2: envisioning the positive implications of apprehending the true perpetrator. Think
Speaker 2: how good you guys will look if we actually catch
Speaker 2: the guy responsible. You'd be solving a horrible crime. Yet
Speaker 2: the room remained largely unconvinced, their skepticism a tangible barrier
Speaker 2: to Brennan's plea for further support. In a final bid
Speaker 2: to sway them, Brennan highlighted the suspect's demeanor. Look At
Speaker 2: how cool this guy is, he urged, replaying the footage
Speaker 2: He just raped and beat a woman to death, or
Speaker 2: he thinks he has, and it's not like he's nervous
Speaker 2: and jittery at all. He's cool as a clam. Now
Speaker 2: you tell me the kind of person who could do
Speaker 2: this kind of thing and be this nonchalant, Well, I'll
Speaker 2: tell you what it means. It means it ain't the
Speaker 2: only time he's done this. The boardroom, which up until
Speaker 2: that point had been a scene of pivotal confrontation between
Speaker 2: ken Brennan's conviction and the stakeholder's skepticism, shifted then into
Speaker 2: a space of negotiation calculation. The discussion that unfolded was
Speaker 2: not merely about the pursuit of justice or the unraveling
Speaker 2: of a heinous crime. It became a deliberation of costs
Speaker 2: versus benefit, a stark, heartless business calculation at the core
Speaker 2: of which lay Brennan's fee juxtaposed against the potential to
Speaker 2: mitigate the hotel's legal and financial vulnerabilities. Despite the varied
Speaker 2: motivations in the room, Brennan remained singularly focused. His interest
Speaker 2: was not in the why behind their eventual decision. It
Speaker 2: was the continuation of the investigation that mattered to him.
Speaker 2: The awakening of old instincts, a deep seated drive for justice,
Speaker 2: propelled him forward. Brennan had not personally met the victim,
Speaker 2: yet the proximity to solving her case, to pinpointing her
Speaker 2: assailant ignited a fervent determination within him. The attacker, roaming
Speaker 2: free nearly a year after the crime, unaware of the
Speaker 2: tightening net, represented more than just a suspect to Brennan.
Speaker 2: He embodied the elusive adversary all detectives yearned to confront,
Speaker 2: the moment of rev the gatcha that validates the painstaking
Speaker 2: journey of investigation. The hotel's decision, hanging in the balance,
Speaker 2: ultimately tipped in Brennan's favor. Management, albeit reluctantly, granted him
Speaker 2: the green light to proceed. Brennan, bolstered by a slim
Speaker 2: margin of support, felt an even greater urgency to validate
Speaker 2: his theory, to vindicate his approach, and above all, to
Speaker 2: capture the man who he believed had eluded justice. The
Speaker 2: challenge of convincing the stakeholders had only intensified Brennan's resolve.
Speaker 2: With renewed determination, he set out to follow the trail
Speaker 2: that he hoped would lead to the moment of capture,
Speaker 2: to the unveiling of the truth, and to the delivery
Speaker 2: of long awaited justice for the victim. The hotel records
Speaker 2: offered no assistance in the investigation. The sheer number of rooms,
Speaker 2: combined with the constant flow of guests, rendered a detailed
Speaker 2: examination of every individual who passed through its doors and
Speaker 2: impractice task. Furthermore, the memory of the hotel staff failed
Speaker 2: to provide any leads. A three hundred pound black man
Speaker 2: with glasses did not stand out in their recollections, leaving
Speaker 2: uncertain whether he was a registered guest, a visitor, or
Speaker 2: possibly sharing accommodations with another guest. The practice of photocopying
Speaker 2: guests driver's licenses was inconsistently applied and proved feudile as well.
Speaker 2: The resulting images were often too blurry to discern any
Speaker 2: useful details or faces. Returning to the surveillance footage with
Speaker 2: a clearer focus, Brennan delved into the task of meticulously
Speaker 2: tracking every movement of the man he now considered his
Speaker 2: primary suspect. This individual's presence was noted in various locations
Speaker 2: within the hotel premises, near the elevator, the lobby, the restaurant,
Speaker 2: and the entrance. During one of these recorded moments by
Speaker 2: the elevator, Brennan observed the suspect was in the company
Speaker 2: of a fit black man, distinguishable by a white T
Speaker 2: shirt adorned with the word Mercury. Initially, the reference seemed
Speaker 2: cryptic to Brennan, invoking thoughts of the automobile manufactur for
Speaker 2: the celestial body or the chemical element, yet offering no
Speaker 2: clear lead or relevance in the case. The interaction captured
Speaker 2: on video did suggest a familiarity between the two men,
Speaker 2: hinting at a possible personal connection or business partnership. Their
Speaker 2: path led them toward the hotel's restaurant, a direction confirmed
Speaker 2: by subsequent surveillance footage from within the dining area. Brennan
Speaker 2: observed the two men associating repeatedly in the video records,
Speaker 2: which raised his suspicion that they were collaborators, perhaps even
Speaker 2: visiting the town together. The men in the Mercury T
Speaker 2: shirt bore an ID tag, but its details were frustratingly
Speaker 2: indiscernible on the video screen due to its size. In
Speaker 2: pursuit of a breakthrough, Brennan reached out to NASA, hoping
Speaker 2: for technological intervention that could enhance the image, but NASA's
Speaker 2: response was disheartening. The limitations of the camera equipment used
Speaker 2: in the hotel's surveillance system, thwarted any hopes of clarifying
Speaker 2: the id tag's details. Faced with this technological impasse, Brennan
Speaker 2: was left to reckon with the realities of the investigation's constraints.
Speaker 2: His knack and conclusion that the victim's exit must have
Speaker 2: been through the hotel's main thoroughfare loomed larger than ever,
Speaker 2: underscoring the need to piece together the sequence of events
Speaker 2: without the aid of enhanced visual evidence. Diving back into
Speaker 2: the surveillance footage once more, Brennan's attention zeroed in on
Speaker 2: a particularly revealing moment captured within the restaurant. The man
Speaker 2: in the white T shirt, previously a figure of interest
Speaker 2: primarily for the word mercury emblazoned on the front, now
Speaker 2: offered a new clue. A brief fortuitous movement as he
Speaker 2: sidestepped another patron momentarily exposing the back of the T
Speaker 2: shirt to the camera, presenting Brennan with a fleeting opportunity
Speaker 2: to glean more information. Despite the challenge of deciphering the
Speaker 2: blurry text, the akin to us squinting in an eye
Speaker 2: chart with inadequate glasses, Brennan discerned the letters V and O,
Speaker 2: bookending a blurry script in the middle. His best guess
Speaker 2: at the word was Verado, a term unfamiliar to him
Speaker 2: but promising a potential lead. Turning to Google for insight
Speaker 2: and discovered that Verado was not without significance. It was,
Speaker 2: in fact the name of a new outboard engine by
Speaker 2: Mercury Marine, a manufacturer known for its boating engines. This
Speaker 2: gave context to the T shirts branding and also situated
Speaker 2: the men within the larger event. Brennan knew that Miami
Speaker 2: hosted a significant boat show in February, coinciding with the
Speaker 2: time of the incident. Brennan considered the possibility that the
Speaker 2: man in the Mercury T shirt and by extension, his
Speaker 2: larger associate, might have been in town for the boat
Speaker 2: show and potentially even work for Mercury Marine. This connection,
Speaker 2: though speculative, offered a tangible lead. It created a time
Speaker 2: frame and specific context for these suspects, and if the
Speaker 2: boat show was the backdrop that explained their presence in Miami,
Speaker 2: it could perhaps be a pathway to uncovering their identities.
Speaker 2: Brennan reached out to Alan Sperling, the head of security
Speaker 2: at Brunswick corporation, parent company of Mercury Marine. He speculated
Speaker 2: that if Mercury Marine had lodged its boat show employees
Speaker 2: at the Airport Regency, he may finally uncover the identities
Speaker 2: of the two men, or at least the man in
Speaker 2: the Mercury T shirt. However, Spurling quickly dashed water on
Speaker 2: this new hope, conveying to Brennan that Mercury Marine's employees
Speaker 2: stayed at a different hotel and none of the booth
Speaker 2: setup crews were at the Regency either. Next, Brennan inquired
Speaker 2: about the distribution of the T shirts, pinpointing them to
Speaker 2: the boat show's food court. This shifted his focus to
Speaker 2: center Plate, the company responsible for food services at the
Speaker 2: boat show, known for managing concessions at large events nationwide.
Speaker 2: Upon contacting Centerplate's human resources, Brennan learned that while the
Speaker 2: company did house some staff at the Regency for the
Speaker 2: boat show, identifying a specific individual among the two hundred
Speaker 2: plus hired for the event posed a significant challenge. Brennan's approach,
Speaker 2: focusing on the standout physical characteristics of the suspect, underscored
Speaker 2: his determination to find a needle in a haystack. Despite
Speaker 2: the vast number of potential leads. His inquiry aimed to
Speaker 2: leverage human memory and observation in the hopes that someone
Speaker 2: would recall a very large black man weighing at least
Speaker 2: three hundred pounds and wearing glasses. If somebody, anybody remembered him,
Speaker 2: that could be a huge break in the investigation, and
Speaker 2: the break finally did come a week after Brennan's inquiry
Speaker 2: into Centerplate, Albeit with its own set of challenges, the
Speaker 2: contact at Centerplate delivered hopeful news. Some employees did recall
Speaker 2: the presence of a noticeably large black man wearing glasses
Speaker 2: during the boat show, but none of them could remember
Speaker 2: his name, and so an essential piece of the puzzle.
Speaker 2: The identity of Brennan's suspect remained elusive, but the trail
Speaker 2: didn't end there. A glimmer of a lead emerged when
Speaker 2: it was mentioned that the man had originally been recruited
Speaker 2: to work at Zephyr Field in Metai, home to the
Speaker 2: New Orleans Zephyr's, a minor league baseball team Triple A
Speaker 2: affiliate of the Miami Marlins that has since been renamed
Speaker 2: the New Orleans Baby Cakes. But just the city of
Speaker 2: New Orleans was something. It was a tangible link, a
Speaker 2: potential point for Brennan to start delving deeper into the
Speaker 2: man's background and whereabouts. However, this lead was immediately overshadowed
Speaker 2: by a truly daunting obstacle. Hurricane Katrina's impact on New
Speaker 2: Orleans and its suburbs, including Metaie, had been catastrophic. The
Speaker 2: disaster had uprooted communities, displacing residents and disrupting lives, leaving
Speaker 2: Metai much like the rest of the affected area, in disarray.
Speaker 2: The aftermath of the hurricane meant that tracking down individuals,
Speaker 2: especially those like the mysterious man, people who might have
Speaker 2: been transient workers or displaced by the storm, would be
Speaker 2: a herculean task. The community, once tightly knit, had been dispersed,
Speaker 2: complicating Brennan's pursuit further, Ken Brennan's determination had become more
Speaker 2: than just a professional commitment, it was a personal crusade.
Speaker 2: As the investigation dragged on, with countless hours invested far
Speaker 2: beyond any financial compensation, ben instead alone in his relentless
Speaker 2: pursuit of justice for a woman whose life had been
Speaker 2: violently disrupted. The underlying motive of the hotel's insurers to
Speaker 2: shift the narrative towards the victim's supposed lifestyle choices in
Speaker 2: order to absolve themselves of liability was a path that
Speaker 2: Brennan refused to tread. Ken Brennan had only one true north.
Speaker 2: From the beginning, he had pledged allegiance to the truth,
Speaker 2: and only the truth, regardless of where it led or
Speaker 2: whom it implicated. Detective Foot, though he had provided Brennan
Speaker 2: with all available information, harbored doubts about the viability of
Speaker 2: the investigation with a caseload of other incidents that offered
Speaker 2: more tangible leads and outcomes. Foot skepticism mirrored the broader
Speaker 2: disinterest that seemed to surround the case. Yet within Brennan's mind,
Speaker 2: the image of the suspect was vivid and constant, an
Speaker 2: imposing figure moving through life with an air of untouchable confidence.
Speaker 2: This mental portrait of the suspect casually interacting with potential
Speaker 2: victims while securing in the belief that his heinous acts
Speaker 2: were untraceable, fueled Brennan's resolve. The notion of the attacker,
Speaker 2: brazen and unrepentant, blending into the every day while hiding
Speaker 2: in plain sight, propelled Brennan forward. It was this compelling
Speaker 2: image and the desire to shatter the perpetrator's smug assurance
Speaker 2: of anonymity that drove him to push the limits of investigation,
Speaker 2: seeking justice in a case that had become far more
Speaker 2: than just another job. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina,
Speaker 2: Brennan found a ray of hope through a connection from
Speaker 2: his past, Captain Ernest Demma of the New Orleans Police Department.
Speaker 2: This wasn't just any acquaintance. Brennan had earned the nickname
Speaker 2: Batman from Dema years earlier during a vacation in the
Speaker 2: French Quarter, when Brennan spontaneously intervened to help Dema subdue
Speaker 2: a suspect that had violently broken free. The God broken
Speaker 2: away from me, Dema recalled, and out of nowhere, here
Speaker 2: comes this guy in a black jacket, flying down the sidewalk,
Speaker 2: who runs him down, tackles him, and held the guy
Speaker 2: until my men could subdue him. He was fantastic. Such
Speaker 2: acts of courage forged bonds that time and distance cannot erode.
Speaker 2: And when Brennan, now in pursuit of justice for a
Speaker 2: case that seemed to reach a dead end at every turn,
Speaker 2: reached out to Dema, the response was swift and unwavering.
Speaker 2: With New Orleans still reeling from the devastation of Katrina,
Speaker 2: Dema leveraged his resources for Brennan. He dispatched his sergeant
Speaker 2: to Zephyr Field. Despite the challenges the minor league baseball
Speaker 2: team faced in restoring the hurricane damaged facilities. This effort
Speaker 2: paid off when Dema delivered a crucial piece of information
Speaker 2: to Brennan. Good news is I know who this guy is. However,
Speaker 2: the revelation was tempered by reality. His name's Mike Jones.
Speaker 2: Now there's probably only a million of them, and he
Speaker 2: doesn't work there anymore, and nobody knows where he went.
Speaker 2: With the name Mike Jones in hand, Brennan dove into
Speaker 2: the records of the Regency Hotel and found a match.
Speaker 2: A guest named Michael Lee Jones had been there during
Speaker 2: the critical period, aligning with the timeline of the assault. However,
Speaker 2: the trail grew cold, with a canceled credit card at
Speaker 2: an outdated Virginia address, the only lead a phone number
Speaker 2: curiously looped back to Centerplate, the company that ran food
Speaker 2: services for the boat convention, not bringing Brennan any closer
Speaker 2: to finding Jones, but the trail was heating up. Knowing
Speaker 2: that Jones had moved on from Centerplate without a trace
Speaker 2: left a gnawing question Where'd he gone? Brennan surmised that
Speaker 2: jones method bold and systematics suggested a routine honed by repetition.
Speaker 2: The mobility afforded by his job with Centerplate as a
Speaker 2: convention food services worker, covering different cities and having his
Speaker 2: expenses covered seemed too ideal for someone with joones predatory
Speaker 2: patterns to abandon lightly. This line of thought propelled Brennan
Speaker 2: to consider where a person with Jones's specific set of
Speaker 2: skills and proclivities might find similar employment. Armed with Centerplate's
Speaker 2: list of main competitors, Brennan embarked on a meticulous process
Speaker 2: of elimination, contacting the HR departments of each company. Despite
Speaker 2: the string of dead ends, Brennan's persistence never wavered. His
Speaker 2: investigative journey took a promising turn when he discovered that
Speaker 2: one of the companies, Ovations, was based in Tampa, a
Speaker 2: destination already on his itinerary. Understanding the value of face
Speaker 2: to face interactions, Brennan seized the opportunity to visit Ovations
Speaker 2: in person, leveraging his persuasive skills, he managed to secure
Speaker 2: a meeting with the company's COO. With a blend of
Speaker 2: earnestness and determination, Brennan laid out the essence of his
Speaker 2: search was Ovations employing a man fitting the description of
Speaker 2: Michael Lee Jones, a towering figure well over three hundred
Speaker 2: pounds and distinctively bespectacled. This question sparked a crucial moment
Speaker 2: in Brennan's investigation. Unlike the other companies, which had promptly
Speaker 2: checked their records only to provide a straightforward denial, the
Speaker 2: executive at Ovations responded differently, Without even consulting a database,
Speaker 2: he set a barrier for any information to be shared. Brennan,
Speaker 2: lacking any law enforcement authority, would need a subpoena. This
Speaker 2: response stood out. It was a deviation from the norm
Speaker 2: that signaled to Brennan he might be onto something. Why
Speaker 2: would you want someone working for you who's a rapist,
Speaker 2: he challenged the COO, only to be met with the
Speaker 2: cold reality of procedural, legal and privacy concerns. Get a subpoena,
Speaker 2: the executive repeated. Brennan acted swiftly to obtain the necessary
Speaker 2: legal document. He reached out the Detective Foot at Miami Dade,
Speaker 2: who was quickly able to facilitate the issuance of a subpoena.
Speaker 2: Ovations promptly complied with the subpoena, and records revealed that
Speaker 2: they did indeed employ an individual matching the exact name
Speaker 2: and description Brennan had been tracing. Michael Lee Jones was
Speaker 2: currently working for them in Frederick, Maryland, standing behind the
Speaker 2: barbecue counter at Harry Grove Stadium, home of the Frederick Keys.
Speaker 2: Then a single, a minor league baseball affiliate of the
Speaker 2: Baltimore Orioles, was Michael Lee Jones. It was an early
Speaker 2: spring evening, and the chill of the Appalachian foothills left
Speaker 2: Detective Foot a Floridian through and through with chattering heath
Speaker 2: beneath his mustache. The call from Brennan had initially stirred
Speaker 2: a mix of admiration and skepticism in Foot. The lead
Speaker 2: on Jones, while unexpected, represented a significant breakthrough in the case,
Speaker 2: a departure from the many fruitless paths previously followed. Acknowledging
Speaker 2: the potential in Brennan's diligent work, Foot recognized the necessity
Speaker 2: of following through with the lead adhering to departmental protocol
Speaker 2: for out of town investigations, which necessitated a collaborative approach.
Speaker 2: Foot coordinated with a colleague who also headed toward the
Speaker 2: DC suburbs. Both men were ready to confront Jones, hoping
Speaker 2: to resolve the mystery that had long eluded them. Earlier
Speaker 2: that day before their visit, Foot had reached out to
Speaker 2: Michael Lee Jones to gauge his availability, Deliberately keeping the
Speaker 2: details sparse. He mentioned that he was looking into an
Speaker 2: incident tied to the Miami Boat Show, a time and
Speaker 2: place that Jones confirmed he was familiar with over the phone.
Speaker 2: Jones's demeanor was cooperative and polite, a stark contrast to
Speaker 2: what one might expect. He acknowledged his presence in Miami
Speaker 2: during the relevant period and agreed to meet, even providing
Speaker 2: directions to their meeting spot at the ballpark. Meeting with
Speaker 2: Jones in person, Foot and his partner discovered that his
Speaker 2: presence was as imposing as it was also unexpected. Jones
Speaker 2: stood tall, his stature commanding attention, with long arms, huge hands,
Speaker 2: and a noticeable round belly. Yet the expectation of encountering
Speaker 2: someone of a potentially menacing nature melted away with Jones's gentle,
Speaker 2: almost passive interaction. His soft spoken, amiable approach, accentuated by
Speaker 2: clear rimmed glasses, painted a picture far removed from any
Speaker 2: preconceived notions of intimidation, from any preconceived notions of a
Speaker 2: violent rapist. Jones, evidently the head of the food service operation,
Speaker 2: exuded a sense of respect and camaraderie among his team,
Speaker 2: a testament to his leadership and likability even in the
Speaker 2: bustling environment of the ballpark food counter. Clad in an
Speaker 2: apron symbolizing his role, he guided Foot and his partner
Speaker 2: to a more seclude picnic area for their discussion, away
Speaker 2: from the eyes and ears of his team and the public.
Speaker 2: In a detailed recounting of their conversation, Detective Foot remembered
Speaker 2: probing Jones about his interactions with women during the Miami
Speaker 2: Boat Show. Jones admitted to a single encounter, revealing a
Speaker 2: preference that set a distinct tone for the conversation. I
Speaker 2: only have sex with white women, he stated plainly. This
Speaker 2: admission opened the door to more specific inquiries from Foot,
Speaker 2: aiming to narrow down the possibilities and find any overlap
Speaker 2: with the case at hand. When asked directly about possible
Speaker 2: sexual liaisons at the Airport Regency, Jones's answer was a
Speaker 2: straightford denial. He clarified that the encounter in Miami involved
Speaker 2: a woman associated with the boat show, but that it
Speaker 2: had taken place elsewhere, distancing any direct connection to the hotel.
Speaker 2: Foot's questions became more pointed, seeking to match the victim's
Speaker 2: description any blond women. The answer was again negative. Further
Speaker 2: diverging from the details of the case. However, Jones provided
Speaker 2: a piece of information that added a new layer to
Speaker 2: his account, noting that the woman he met was German,
Speaker 2: a detail that stood out, albeit not aligning with the
Speaker 2: specifics of the case, although it doesn't seem too far
Speaker 2: fetched that someone might mistake a Ukrainian accent for a
Speaker 2: German one if they were unfamiliar with either. Under the
Speaker 2: cold evening sky Foot cut straight to the chase, feeling
Speaker 2: the weight of the investigation bearing down on him. Look,
Speaker 2: I've got a girl who was raped that week. Did
Speaker 2: you have anything to do with it? He pressed. Jones's
Speaker 2: reaction was of genuine shock. No, of course, not of course,
Speaker 2: not no way, he responded. He seemed appalled, his shock,
Speaker 2: echoing the seriousness of the accusation. Foot was undeterred and
Speaker 2: pushed further. You didn't beat the shit out of this
Speaker 2: girl and lever for dead in a field down there Again,
Speaker 2: Jones vehemently denied any involvement. Oh no, he said, no, no.
Speaker 2: The proposition of a DNA test was a litmus test
Speaker 2: for Foot. Are you willing to give me a DNA specimen?
Speaker 2: To which Jones agreed without hesitation to Foot. This readiness
Speaker 2: to cooperate seemed to signal innocence. After Jones consent that
Speaker 2: and provided the sample, Foot left Maryland, his mind nearly
Speaker 2: made up that Michael Lee Jones wasn't their man. Back
Speaker 2: in communication with Brennan, Foot expressed his doubts. I'm telling you, Ken,
Speaker 2: this ain't the guy. Brennan, however, was not swayed, maintaining
Speaker 2: a staunch belief in Jones's guilt. No, man, He's definitely
Speaker 2: the fucking guy. Driven by this conviction, Brennan himself visited Frederick,
Speaker 2: engaging Jones in conversations that yielded no confession or slip up.
Speaker 2: It wasn't until months later that the narrative took a
Speaker 2: dramatic turn. The DNA results had finally been processed, and
Speaker 2: they delivered a jarring verdict. Foots called a Brennan was
Speaker 2: both a concession and a revelation. You ain't gonna believe this,
Speaker 2: he began, setting the stage for the unexpected conclusion. You
Speaker 2: are right, I have a feeling, Brennan believed it. Jones's
Speaker 2: DNA had matched, solidifying his connection to the crime in
Speaker 2: a way that circumstantial evidence and denials could not contest.
Speaker 2: In October, Brennan traveled to Frederick to witness the culmination
Speaker 2: of the investigation Jones's arrest by Foot, eleven months after
Speaker 2: taking on the case. Foot charged Jones with serious offenses,
Speaker 2: including rape, kidnapping, and severely beating a young woman. In
Speaker 2: the interrogation room of the Frederick Police Department, Jones appeared
Speaker 2: an imposing figure, his large frame making the chair beneath
Speaker 2: him seem almost comically small. Despite his size, his denials
Speaker 2: were delivered in a surprisingly gentle voice, contrasting with the
Speaker 2: gravity of his situation. He vehemently denied the accusations with
Speaker 2: wide gestures, yet without showing anger, emphasizing his innocence. Jones
Speaker 2: insisted on his innocence, claiming he would never harm a woman.
Speaker 2: He described the victim as a hooker he had paid
Speaker 2: one hundred dollars to, maintaining that their interaction was consensual
Speaker 2: and she was unharmed, albeit intoxicated when he left. However,
Speaker 2: when presented with photos of the victim's battered face, Jones
Speaker 2: still stuck to his narrative, even as the DNA evidence
Speaker 2: incontrovertibly linked him to her. The stark evidence of injury
Speaker 2: e ange Jones's account, confronting him with the physical reality
Speaker 2: of the victim's condition, which sharply contradicted his claims of
Speaker 2: a harmless encounter. I did not hurt that girl, Jones asserted,
Speaker 2: recoiling from the photos presented to him as his voice
Speaker 2: escalated a note of desperation, crept in. I'm not violent.
Speaker 2: I never hit a fucking woman in my whole fucking life.
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna hurt her. Confronted by Brennan about the
Speaker 2: peculiar behavior of moving his suitcase to his car in
Speaker 2: the early hours, Jones offered a fragmented justification. I couldn't
Speaker 2: remember if we were leaving that day or the next day.
Speaker 2: I wasn't sure for some reason, so I thought, fuck it.
Speaker 2: Time to go. Brennan's interrogation revealed a discrepancy that momentarily
Speaker 2: caught Jones off guard. While Jones claimed his suitcase was
Speaker 2: filled with innocuous items like clothes, shoes, and a video game,
Speaker 2: Brennan pointed out that the effort it took to pull
Speaker 2: the suitcase off of the elevator hinted at a significant weight.
Speaker 2: Jones then hastily amended his account to include a quote
Speaker 2: large number of books unquote, citing his passion for reading. However,
Speaker 2: when pressed for details about his reading material, Jones faltered,
Speaker 2: unable to recall even a single title, a lapse that
Speaker 2: cast further doubt on his credibility and deepened the intrigue
Speaker 2: of what truly was contained within the suitcase. Jones's cooperative
Speaker 2: demeanor throughout the process played significantly in his favor, softening
Speaker 2: the impact of the damning DNA evidence against him. His
Speaker 2: previous arrest for soliciting a prostitute provided a plausible explanation
Speaker 2: for his reluctance to admit the transaction with the victim. Furthermore,
Speaker 2: his willingness to provide a DNA sample voluntarily could be
Speaker 2: interpreted by some as a sign of innocence, counteracting assumptions
Speaker 2: of guilt. The crux of the trial would likely pivot
Speaker 2: on the credibility of the testimonies Jones's word versus that
Speaker 2: of a young woman. However, the victim's effectiveness as a
Speaker 2: witness was compromised. Although she identified Jones from a line up,
Speaker 2: her hazy recollection of the events and the fact that
Speaker 2: she had seen Joeones previously, making his face familiar compared
Speaker 2: to the others in the lineup, diminished the reliability of
Speaker 2: her identification. Discrepancies between her account of the assault and
Speaker 2: the narrative constructed through Brennan's investigative efforts introduced further doubt.
Speaker 2: Even Detective Foot, initially skeptical of Brennan's single minded pursuit,
Speaker 2: began to question the veracity of the victim's story and
Speaker 2: light of the investigative findings. This confluence of factors, the
Speaker 2: victim's unreliable testimony, Jones's consistent cooperation, and the explanations for
Speaker 2: the DNA evidence muddied the waters of the case, challenging
Speaker 2: the straightforward narrative of guilt that seemed apparent at the
Speaker 2: investigation's outset. Ultimately, the legal proceedings in Miami culminated in
Speaker 2: a plea deal for Jones, who admitted to sexual assault
Speaker 2: in exchange for the dismissal of the graver charges, and
Speaker 2: he wound up with a relatively light sentence of two
Speaker 2: years in prison. For Brennan, who had tirelessly pursued Jones,
Speaker 2: believing firmly in his guilt beyond just this one incident,
Speaker 2: such an outcome was less than satisfactory, and once again,
Speaker 2: despite his frustration, Brennan's instincts were sound. The conclusion of
Speaker 2: this case was merely the beginning of a broader revelation
Speaker 2: regarding Jones's criminal activities. Brennan's conviction in Jones's pattern of behavior,
Speaker 2: rooted in the initial surveillance footage and reinforced by his
Speaker 2: personal interactions, remained unshaken. He saw Jones's actions not as isolated,
Speaker 2: but indicative of a serial predator's modus operendi. Brennan's observations
Speaker 2: and instincts led him to stress to detective foot the
Speaker 2: importance of entering Jones's DNA into the National database CODIS,
Speaker 2: the Combined DNA Index system. Brennan was confident that Jones's
Speaker 2: past would catch up with him through this tool. COTIS
Speaker 2: is a database managed by the FBI containing millions of
Speaker 2: DNA profiles from offenders and unsolved crime scenes, and it
Speaker 2: serves as a crucial resource in linking crimes across jurisdictions.
Speaker 2: The injury of Jones's DNA by the Miami Dade Police
Speaker 2: was a pivotal step. After the procedural verification by the FBI,
Speaker 2: Jones was linked to three additional cases, underscoring the efficacy
Speaker 2: of CODIS in bringing connections that might otherwise remain obscured
Speaker 2: by geographic and temporal distances, meaning the amount of time
Speaker 2: that had passed between events temporal distances. Linking Jones to
Speaker 2: three more cases validated Brennan's assertions about Jones's ongoing threat
Speaker 2: and demonstrated the essential role of DNA evidence in unveiling
Speaker 2: the broader scope of a criminal's activities. The matches found
Speaker 2: within CODIS not only shed light on Jones's history of violence,
Speaker 2: but also provided a measure of vindication for Brennan's unwavering
Speaker 2: pursuit of justice, illustrating that even when a case seems
Speaker 2: to reach a resolution, the story and the search for
Speaker 2: truth can continue to unfold. Revealing deeper layers of criminal
Speaker 2: behavior and the need for further justice. And we'll talk
Speaker 2: about that now as our scene shifts to an office
Speaker 2: in the Colorado Springs Police Department Sex Crimes Unit, where
Speaker 2: Detective Terry Thrumson was deeply troubled by an unresolved case.
Speaker 2: A blondhaired, blue eyed woman had endured a harrowing experience
Speaker 2: on December one, two thousand and five. She was offered
Speaker 2: a lift by a stranger, a large black man wearing glasses,
Speaker 2: who then manipulated his way into her apartment and assaulted her,
Speaker 2: muffling her cries with a forceful hand. For over two years,
Speaker 2: Thrumston grappled with a lack of leads, leaving the case
Speaker 2: in a standstill until a breakthrough occurred. DNA evidence collected
Speaker 2: from the victim was matched to Michael Lee Jones in
Speaker 2: New Orleans. The pattern of Jones's predatory behavior was echoed
Speaker 2: in the experiences of two other victims, underscoring the serial
Speaker 2: nature of his crimes. One victim recounted a knight in
Speaker 2: the French Quarter in two thousand three, where after seeking
Speaker 2: a calve, she was lured into a vehicle by a
Speaker 2: man fitting Jones's description, he took her to an isolated
Speaker 2: location and assault her, an act marked by violence and control,
Speaker 2: similar to the account from Colorado Springs. She fought back,
Speaker 2: managing to bite his palm during the attack. Despite her
Speaker 2: report and the collection of DNA evidence, her case also
Speaker 2: remained unresolved until the CODAS system identified Jones as the perpetrator.
Speaker 2: The second victim from New Orleans shared a narrative that
Speaker 2: paralleled the others, but was unable to positively identify Jones
Speaker 2: from a lineup. However, these three cases, connected by the
Speaker 2: thread of Jones's DNA revealed the grim reality of his
Speaker 2: actions across different states and years. The CODIS matches brought
Speaker 2: not only long awaited progress to stalled investigations, but also
Speaker 2: highlighted the importance of DNA evidence in linking crimes to
Speaker 2: perpetrators who might otherwise remain hidden in the shadows, eluding
Speaker 2: accountability for their heinous actions. Michael Lee Jones's movements across
Speaker 2: the United States culminated in a series of trials that
Speaker 2: tied together the grotesque narrative of his crimes, verified to
Speaker 2: have been in Colorado Springs and New Orcas during the
Speaker 2: time the assaults occurred, Jones faced extradition to Colorado Springs
Speaker 2: for trial as his sentence in Florida neared its end.
Speaker 2: The trial in Colorado Springs was unique due to the
Speaker 2: unfortunate death of the local victim, a circumstance that left
Speaker 2: Deputy District Attorney Ben Cecil without a key piece of testimony.
Speaker 2: In an innovative approach to prosecution, Cecil built his case
Speaker 2: around the pattern of behavior exhibited by Jones, Drawing on
Speaker 2: the experiences of victims from Miami and New Orleans. The
Speaker 2: courtroom became a convergence point for the narrative of Jones's
Speaker 2: widespread assaults. The Miami victim and one of the New
Speaker 2: Orleans victims took the stand not just to support the
Speaker 2: DNA evidence, but to identify Jones personally as their assailant.
Speaker 2: Their testimonies were integral to Cecil's argument, which highlighted a
Speaker 2: common plan, scheme or design in Jones's actions, a modus operendi,
Speaker 2: as identifiable as the DNA he left behind. The testimony
Speaker 2: of the New Orleans victim was particularly compelling, even years
Speaker 2: after the attack. Her recollection was vivid, her indignation palpable,
Speaker 2: underscoring the lasting impact of Jones's actions. Conversely, the Miami
Speaker 2: victim's testimony was less effective, hampered by inconsistencies in her
Speaker 2: account and language barriers which Jones's defense did not hesitate
Speaker 2: to exploit. This juxtaposition of witnesses illustrated the challenges of
Speaker 2: relying on personal testimony in court, where the strength of
Speaker 2: a case can hinge on clarity and credibility. Jones maintained
Speaker 2: his innocence in the face of the charges brought against
Speaker 2: him in Colorado, adopting a defense that the encounters had
Speaker 2: been consensual and labeling the accuser as a prostitute, a
Speaker 2: claim devoid of evidence and a pretty disgusting claim to
Speaker 2: make without any evidence, especially given that in this case
Speaker 2: the victim had tragically passed away. Jones's defense strategy did
Speaker 2: not involve him taking the stand. Instead, his attorneys voiced
Speaker 2: these arguments on his behalf. The jury, however, faced the
Speaker 2: challenging task of reconciling Jones's defense with the pattern of
Speaker 2: accusations against him. While the notion of two individuals in
Speaker 2: different states, under different circumstances accusing a man fitting Jones's
Speaker 2: distinctive description of assault could be seen as a coincidence.
Speaker 2: The introduction of a third similar accusation strained credibility. The
Speaker 2: jurors were presented with a scenario that defied simple explanations,
Speaker 2: especially in light of the absence of any substantiation for
Speaker 2: the claim that the victims were engaged in prostitution. Central
Speaker 2: to undermining Jones's defense was the irrefutable evidence provided by DNA.
Speaker 2: This scientific proof, combined with the improbable coincidence suggested by
Speaker 2: his defense, led the jurors to a conclusion that transcended
Speaker 2: the reasonable doubts Jones's lawyers sought to instill. The DNA
Speaker 2: acted not only as a link to each crime, but
Speaker 2: also as a testament to the pattern of behavior that
Speaker 2: Jones and his defense attempted to dismiss, anchoring the case
Speaker 2: against him in a reality that his narrative could not distort.
Speaker 2: Michael Lee Jones was convicted in twenty ten, and he
Speaker 2: is now now spending the expanse of his remaining years
Speaker 2: behind the walls of the Fremont Correctional Facility in Colorado.
Speaker 2: The consequence of his actions distilled into sentences that combined
Speaker 2: anchor him to a life in prison. The judgments passed
Speaker 2: twenty four years to life for sexual assault with force
Speaker 2: and an additional twelve years to life for felonious sexual
Speaker 2: contact demonstrate the severity of his crimes in legal terms.
Speaker 2: Thirty eight years old at the time of his conviction
Speaker 2: in twenty ten, Jones would now be fifty two, and
Speaker 2: his future is defined by the calendar of the penal system,
Speaker 2: with a parole hearing his soonest parole hearing on the
Speaker 2: horizon for twenty thirty two. This is the absolute earliest
Speaker 2: that Jones might argue for a life beyond prison. However,
Speaker 2: Colorado State still projects that Michael Lee Jones will be
Speaker 2: a permanent resident of the penal system until his death. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: and I suppose, obviously, the repercussions of Jones's act actions
Speaker 2: extend beyond the confines of the correctional facility. His victim
Speaker 2: in Miami pursued justice through civil means, leading to a
Speaker 2: three hundred thousand dollars settlement with the hotel and its
Speaker 2: security company. The settlement, while it certainly cannot undo the
Speaker 2: trauma endured, serves as a tangible acknowledgment at least of
Speaker 2: the harm suffered and a reminder of the lasting impact
Speaker 2: of Jones's crimes. Back in Miami, Ken Brennan returned to
Speaker 2: his private detective work, carrying with him a deep sense
Speaker 2: of accomplishment from the Michael Lee Jones case. He is
Speaker 2: enormously proud, and understandably so, of the pivotal role he
Speaker 2: played in ensuring Jones's incarceration. Brennan, always confident in his
Speaker 2: investigative acumen, sees the convictions as just the beginning, saying
Speaker 2: at the time the cases they got on him, they're
Speaker 2: just the tip of the iceberg. Once other jurisdictions start
Speaker 2: checking their DNA files on cases when this guy was
Speaker 2: at large, I guarantee you they'll find some more. As
Speaker 2: we know, Ken Brennan's instincts have a pretty strong track
Speaker 2: rerend Now, in twenty and fifteen, while incarcerated, Michael Lee
Speaker 2: Jones pled guilty to the New Orleans rape charges. I'm
Speaker 2: not sure if any additional victims of his have been found.
Speaker 2: If anybody knows more, I'd love to know. Until next time,
Speaker 2: I'm Zevan Odelberg and this has been kind of murdery.
Speaker 1: If you like the show, please subscribe, review and tell
Speaker 1: your friends. You can find us on social media at
Speaker 1: kinda Murdery or email at Kindomurdery at gmail dot com.
Apple Podcasts
Castbox
Castro
Goodpods
Moon FM
Overcast
Pocket Casts
Podbean
Podcast Addict
Podcast Republic
Spotify