The McStay Family Murders: Part Four
Sources:
https://coronadotimes.com/event/down-to-the-bone-caitlin-rother-and-the-mcstay-family-murders/
https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/judge-unseals-court-records-in-mcstay-murder-case/509-5297be95-2f41-4ce7-931e-8c3dc98e0918
https://allthatsinteresting.com/mcstay-family-murders
https://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/missing-mcstay-family-cross-mexico/story?id=10042816
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/mcstay-family-murder-trial-charles-merritt-closing-arguments-jury/159073/
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-mcstay-family-deaths-20190120-story.html
https://www.sbsun.com/2019/03/11/key-prosecution-evidence-flopped-in-mcstay-family-murder-case-defense-contends/
https://www.sbsun.com/2019/03/11/key-prosecution-evidence-flopped-in-mcstay-family-murder-case-defense-contends/
https://abc7.com/post/mcstay-murders-merritt-attorneys-poke-holes-in-timeline/5190475/
https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/01/justice/mcstay-case-five-questions
https://press.wbd.com/us/media-release/investigation-discovery/go-inside-controversial-and-shocking-trial-charles-chase-merritt-mcstay-family
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/kinda-murdery-true-crime-murder-stories--5496890/support.
Zevon Odelberg is a true crime podcast host and disability advocate. Zevon has cerebral palsy and he wants Kinda Murdery to be welcoming community for people with disabilities and for people living with challenges of any kind. Life can be hard, but being together makes it better.
Speaker 1: Warning. Kind of Murdery contains adult themes, explicit language, and
Speaker 1: descriptions of violence. It is not suitable for anyone, and
Speaker 1: we recommend you stop listening now.
Speaker 2: True crime with a dash of the paranormal, the garish,
Speaker 2: the strange in the darkly comic. A podcast that's about
Speaker 2: more than just murder. It's my very own pocket dimension,
Speaker 2: home to a curated collection of bizarre and compelling stories,
Speaker 2: the unsolved, the unsettling, and the unbelievable. I cover it
Speaker 2: all just so long as it's kind of murdery. Hello, everybody,
Speaker 2: welcome and thank you for being here. I am Zevan Odelberg,
Speaker 2: and this is kind of murdery. We've got a big
Speaker 2: time episode today. It's episode four of the Mixedday Family Murders.
Speaker 2: That's right, I said four. So if you haven't heard
Speaker 2: one through three yet, go ahead and listen to them
Speaker 2: and then come on back.
Speaker 3: I'll save you a seat. We've got a lot to
Speaker 3: get to. It's a big time episode. Today is the
Speaker 3: day that we uncover the alleged killer of the McStay family.
Speaker 3: This story is tragic, is held, but it's also compelling,
Speaker 3: and I want to get right down to it. So
Speaker 3: let's do that. I'm glad you're here with me. Episode
Speaker 3: four of kind of Murderies. The Mixstay Family Murders starts now.
Speaker 3: Three years earlier, when Earth Inspired Products was still a
Speaker 3: growing online storefront for decorative fountains and water features. Dan
Speaker 3: Cavanaugh entered the picture quietly. He was not a fabricator
Speaker 3: or a designer. He didn't weld metal or sketch basin layouts.
Speaker 3: His domain was digital. He understood search engine rankings, keyword density,
Speaker 3: web traffic analytics, and how to turn online visibility into
Speaker 3: steady revenue. Joseph McStay built custom water features. Cavanaugh built
Speaker 3: the audience that found them, that fell in love with them,
Speaker 3: that purchased them. By the time the McStay family disappeared
Speaker 3: in February twenty ten, Earth Inspired Products had become more
Speaker 3: than a side venture. It was a functioning e commerce
Speaker 3: operation with measurable growth. Website traffic had increased steadily, Online
Speaker 3: sales were consistent. The company's name surfaced prominently in search
Speaker 3: results related to indoor fountains in decorative water installations. Much
Speaker 3: of that visibility, according to Dan Kavanaugh, was the result
Speaker 3: of his work. He managed the back end of the
Speaker 3: website optimized product listings, and monitored conversion rates. He described
Speaker 3: his role not as tech support, but as partnership. When
Speaker 3: detectives revisited the structure of the company after the mix
Speaker 3: day remains were identified in the desert, they were no
Speaker 3: longer looking at Earth Inspired Products as a simple business venture.
Speaker 3: They were examining it as a potential motive structure, and
Speaker 3: they needed clarity on that structure. Who owned the company,
Speaker 3: whoationally controlled it. Kavanagh characterized the arrangement as shared From
Speaker 3: early on. He spoke about collaboration, shared profits, a division
Speaker 3: of labor in which Joseph handled product design and supplier
Speaker 3: relationships while he handled digital growth and revenue channels. He
Speaker 3: described decisions being made together, often informally, without rigid contracts.
Speaker 3: Detectives asked for documentation in corporation records, partnership agreements, tax filings,
Speaker 3: any written confirmation of equity percentages. Some existed and some
Speaker 3: did not. The business, like many small enterprises that scale, quickly,
Speaker 3: appeared to have evolved faster than its paperwork. Operational ownership
Speaker 3: emerged as a central concept in the investigation. Detectives mapped
Speaker 3: who could log into the company's web hosting account, who
Speaker 3: controlled the domain registration, whose email address was attached to
Speaker 3: payment processing accounts, whose name appeared on merchant services agreements.
Speaker 3: In small companies, control is off and dispersed. Out of convenience,
Speaker 3: there are shared passwords, administrative privileges granted to multiple users.
Speaker 3: That diffusion makes day to day operations easier and forensic
Speaker 3: clarity harder. Joseph's father, Patrick mcstaye, began to express concern
Speaker 3: during this phase of the investigation. His suspicion did not
Speaker 3: surface as accusation, but as unease. He had always believed
Speaker 3: his son owned earth inspired products outright. It carried Joseph's
Speaker 3: vision in Joseph's labour. Hearing that another man, Dan Cavanaugh,
Speaker 3: described himself as co owner of the company unsettled Patrick.
Speaker 3: He asked detectives whether that claim was accurate. Detectives did
Speaker 3: not answer immediately. They continued gathering documents, tracing corporate filings,
Speaker 3: examining tax records, and comparing them against Kavanaugh's description of
Speaker 3: the partnership. The distinction between founder and operator became increasingly relevant.
Speaker 3: Joseph had created the company and built the product line.
Speaker 3: Kavanagh had built the digital infrastructure that allowed customers to
Speaker 3: find and purchase those products. Without the website, there were
Speaker 3: no online sales. Without the products, there was nothing to
Speaker 3: sell the business function because both components existed simultaneously. Detectives
Speaker 3: restructured the early years of the partnership. Email exchanges showed
Speaker 3: enthusiasm and forward planning, discussions about expanding inventory, projections for
Speaker 3: revenue growth, conversations about scaling marketing campaigns. Nothing in those
Speaker 3: exchanges suggested hostility. The language was collaborative. The tone was
Speaker 3: forward looking, optimistic. But as the company grew, so did
Speaker 3: its revenue. Revenue raises, questions of percentage, percentage raises, questions
Speaker 3: of entitlement. Detectives were careful not to assume conflict where
Speaker 3: none was documented. They focused instead on structure. If Joseph
Speaker 3: were suddenly unable to participate in the company's operations, who
Speaker 3: could continue running it without interruption, who had access to accounts,
Speaker 3: who had the authority to change listing, re route payments,
Speaker 3: or adjust pricing. The homicide investigation required more than understanding
Speaker 3: who liked or disliked whom. It required understanding who held leverage.
Speaker 3: Ownership in legal terms could be contested later, control in
Speaker 3: practical terms could be exercised. Immediately, as detectives reviewed corporate
Speaker 3: documents and back end access credentials, a pattern began to emerge,
Speaker 3: not of overt wrongdoing, but of concentrated authority in the
Speaker 3: hands of the person managing the digital spine of the company.
Speaker 3: Patrick mcstay's suspicion remained persistent. He did not accuse Kavanaugh directly.
Speaker 3: He asked questions about structure, about paperwork, about whether his
Speaker 3: son had formalized the partnership in writing. Detectives noted his concerns,
Speaker 3: but continued their methodical review. They were not yet prepared
Speaker 3: to label anyone as a suspect. They were tracing authority.
Speaker 3: The business had been growing, the revenue was real, the
Speaker 3: digital architecture was sophistically enough to operate remotely. Those facts
Speaker 3: were not incriminating on their own, but they established something critical.
Speaker 3: Earth Inspired Products was not merely Joseph's livelihood. It was
Speaker 3: an asset, and like any asset, it could be controlled.
Speaker 3: By the end of this phase of the investigation, detectives
Speaker 3: had not drawn conclusions. They had clarified structure. Earth Inspired
Speaker 3: Products was no longer just background context. It was a
Speaker 3: framework through which control, authority, and potential motive could be examined.
Speaker 3: Suspicion had not solidified, but it had begun to orient
Speaker 3: toward the person who understood the company's inner workings. At
Speaker 3: the level of passwords, logins, and merchant accounts. The fracture
Speaker 3: was subtle. It did not appear as an argument or
Speaker 3: a threat. It appeared as a question, in the absence
Speaker 3: of Joseph McStay, who, in practical terms, owned the business
Speaker 3: he built. By the time detectives shifted from defining ownership
Speaker 3: to defining control, the questions became more granular. It was
Speaker 3: no longer an enough to understand who believed they were
Speaker 3: a partner. The focus moved to who could actually act.
Speaker 3: Detectives began mapping access points one by one. Who registered
Speaker 3: the domain name under, whose email address was listed, who
Speaker 3: had the ability to renew it or transfer it. Next
Speaker 3: came the web hosting account. Hosting credentials allow a user
Speaker 3: to modify site content, upload files, change product descriptions, adjust pricing,
Speaker 3: and redirect traffic. Detectives requested records from the hosting provider,
Speaker 3: account holders, ip log in histories, timestamps of administrative changes.
Speaker 3: They wanted to see whether access was centralized or dispersed.
Speaker 3: Payment processing required its own layer of authority. Merchant accounts
Speaker 3: linked to credit card processors often list a primary account holder.
Speaker 3: That person has the ability to route deposits, alter linked
Speaker 3: bank accounts, and modify settlement settings. Detectives subpoenaed those records,
Speaker 3: as well, tracing whose name appeared on the agreements and
Speaker 3: whose bank accounts were tied to the revenue stream. Kavanaugh
Speaker 3: explained that much of the technical control rested with him
Speaker 3: because it had to. He was the one maintaining Search
Speaker 3: engine optimization's campaigns, updating metadata and responding to traffic fluctuations.
Speaker 3: It would have been inefficient, he said, for Joseph to
Speaker 3: handle those technical adjustments. Detectives did not dispute the point,
Speaker 3: they simply recorded it. They asked whether credentials had ever
Speaker 3: been shared. In small companies, shared passwords are common. Kavanagh
Speaker 3: acknowledged that there were times when the passwords and credentials
Speaker 3: were exchanged for convenience. Detectives noted that shared credentials complicate attribution.
Speaker 3: If multiple people know a password, determining who executed a
Speaker 3: change becomes more difficult. They turned to email authority. Earth
Speaker 3: Inspired Products maintained official company email addresses tied to the domain,
Speaker 3: who controlled those inboxes, who could send messages appearing to
Speaker 3: originate from the company. Detectives requested server logs to determine
Speaker 3: which IP addresses accessed those accounts, and when the pattern
Speaker 3: that emerged was not dramatic, it was functional. Kavanaugh's role
Speaker 3: placed him at the center of the company's digital architecture.
Speaker 3: He had legitimate reason to possess administrative privileges. That authority
Speaker 3: alone did not imply a wrongdoing, but it established capacity
Speaker 3: within the company. The Hawaii trip surfaced again during this
Speaker 3: mapping process, but detectives approached it differently. Instead of framing
Speaker 3: it as an alibi or absence, they examined it as
Speaker 3: a question of remote capability. If administrative control could be
Speaker 3: exercised from anywhere with Internet access, physical distance then did
Speaker 3: not necessarily limit operational influence. They asked about internet access
Speaker 3: during that period, Hotel, Wi Fi, personal laptops. The inquiry
Speaker 3: remained technical, not accusatory, but one man, Dan Kavanaugh, was
Speaker 3: at the center of everything. Suspicion had not solidified into accusation.
Speaker 3: It had, however, begun to lean and when it escalated,
Speaker 3: it did not escalate with an accusation. The escalation began
Speaker 3: with a document. Detectives were reviewing corporate filings when the
Speaker 3: transaction surfaced. Earth Inspired Products had changed hands. PaperWorks showed
Speaker 3: that the company had been sold for approximately two hundred
Speaker 3: and fifty thousand dollars, and the date of the transaction mattered.
Speaker 3: Joseph McStay was reported missing on February fifteenth, twenty ten.
Speaker 3: The formal declaration of death would not come for years,
Speaker 3: yet the sale of the business occurred while his legal
Speaker 3: status remained unresolved. Detectives pulled the exact filing date. They
Speaker 3: obtained the transfer agreement. They examined the purchase documents line
Speaker 3: by line, who authorized it. The signature block bore Dan
Speaker 3: Kavanaugh's name. The paperwork around the sale did not sit
Speaker 3: quietly once detectives began laying it beside everything else. The
Speaker 3: transfer of Earth Inspired Products had occurred months after the
Speaker 3: family disappeared, at a time when Joseph had not been
Speaker 3: declared dead and no executor had been appointed. The buyer
Speaker 3: paid two hundred and fifty thousand dollars for the business.
Speaker 3: That number, standing alone, felt concrete. It suggested valuation, negotiation,
Speaker 3: and authority, but detectives were less interested in the amount
Speaker 3: than in the timing. They pulled their calendars back out
Speaker 3: February fourth, twenty ten, the last confirmed day anyone heard
Speaker 3: from the Mixed Days February fifteenth. The Missing Persons report
Speaker 3: the business transfer PaperWorks surfaced more than a year later,
Speaker 3: in the summer of twenty eleven. By then, the case
Speaker 3: had gone cold in the public eye. The Mix Days
Speaker 3: were presumed gone, but legally still alive. No death certificates,
Speaker 3: no probate, no formal dissolution of partnership. Detectives examined the
Speaker 3: documents line by line. Who signed, under what authority, What
Speaker 3: legal mechanism permitted the sale as it structured as an
Speaker 3: acid transfer, a stock transfer, a liquidation. The answers mattered.
Speaker 3: If Kavanagh had ownership, he could argue he had authority
Speaker 3: to sell. If he did not, the sale was something
Speaker 3: else entirely. Investigator's subpoenaed bank records connected to the transaction.
Speaker 3: They traced the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars. They
Speaker 3: examined whether the money passed directly to CAVANAUGHH or to
Speaker 3: an intermediary corporate account. First, they mapped the routing paths.
Speaker 3: What they did not find, at least not immediately was
Speaker 3: an obvious procedural violation that screamed fraud. The transaction appeared documented,
Speaker 3: It appeared processed. It appeared, at least on its surface,
Speaker 3: administratively valid. That did not settle the question of legitimacy.
Speaker 3: Patrick mcstay's insistence that Dan quote owned nothing unquote remained
Speaker 3: in the file. But detectives knew that family indignation was
Speaker 3: not corporate structure contracts in corporation filings tax documents. They
Speaker 3: requested the original articles of incorporation for Earth Inspired Products.
Speaker 3: They reviewed whether Kavanaugh's name appeared anywhere as a formal officer, shareholder,
Speaker 3: or managing member. The paperwork showed Joseph as the principle,
Speaker 3: but small businesses often evolved faster than their filings. Detectives
Speaker 3: had seen that before. Still, something subtle began to bother
Speaker 3: analysts reviewing the sale. The valuation. Earth Inspired Products had
Speaker 3: been profitable. Sales were strong in the months before the disappearance,
Speaker 3: Web traffic was up, revenue had grown. Yet the final
Speaker 3: sale price did not reflect a distressed liquidation, nor did
Speaker 3: it reflect the kind of premium often associated with a
Speaker 3: thriving niche e commerce company. It sat smack in the middle,
Speaker 3: not a fire sale and not a windfall. Detectives brought
Speaker 3: in a forensic accountant to review comparable businesses from that period.
Speaker 3: What was a company of that size with that revenue
Speaker 3: realistically worth In twenty eleven. The estimate range overlapped with
Speaker 3: the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars figure, but barely.
Speaker 3: It was not wildly off. It was not dramatically low.
Speaker 3: It was arguable that ambiguity complicated motive. If someone murdered
Speaker 3: Joseph to gain control of the company, the financial payoff
Speaker 3: would need to justify the risk. Two hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: thousand dollars, while significant, was not generational wealth. It was
Speaker 3: not a life altering sum in the context of a
Speaker 3: quadruple homicide. Motive built solely on that number felt thin,
Speaker 3: But then, of course people had been killed for far less.
Speaker 3: But something about it didn't satisfy detectives, so they returned
Speaker 3: to the timeline. When the mix days disappeared, Earth Inspired
Speaker 3: Products did not immediately change hands. There was no rapid
Speaker 3: seizure of control, no sudden announcement, no immediate restructuring. The
Speaker 3: business continued operating. Online orders were processed, and the website
Speaker 3: remained functional. That continuity suggested forethought, but it also suggested
Speaker 3: patients if the goal had been immediate financial gain, why wait.
Speaker 3: Kavanaugh's Hawaii trip still hovered in the background. Airline records
Speaker 3: confirmed Dan had been on the islands during the early
Speaker 3: days after February fourth. Credit card transactions supported that he
Speaker 3: was physically present there. Cell tower data from his phone
Speaker 3: aligned with the geography. Remote access remained technically possible that
Speaker 3: fact never left the board, but the physical alibi held.
Speaker 3: Detectives were careful not to discard a suspect simply because
Speaker 3: an alibi existed. They had seen orchestrated crimes before, but
Speaker 3: they also knew when suspicion began to outrun evidence. The
Speaker 3: sale created heat, it created motive. On paper, it made
Speaker 3: narrative sense. But as analysts widened the lens beyond the transaction,
Speaker 3: inconsistencies began to surface, not explode of contradictions, but small misalignments.
Speaker 3: Login records tied to the company's back end showed activity
Speaker 3: that did not neatly match Hawaii timestamps. Certain administrative changes
Speaker 3: occurred during windows when Dan's confirmed location data did not
Speaker 3: support live logins. The discrepancies were minor. They could be
Speaker 3: explained by saved credentials or automated systems, but they required explanation.
Speaker 3: At the same time, detectives revisited early financial movements from
Speaker 3: February twenty ten itself. They looked not just at Earth
Speaker 3: inspired products as a whole, but at personal accounts connected
Speaker 3: to Joseph's business circle. Some transactions did not belong to
Speaker 3: Dan at all. They belonged to someone closer. The name
Speaker 3: had been in the file since the beginning. It had
Speaker 3: been interviewed early. It had sat quietly in the background
Speaker 3: while attention drifted toward Mexico, toward digital travel searches, toward
Speaker 3: corps for ownership. Now analysts began cross referencing that name
Speaker 3: with time stamps from February fourth. The pivot was not dramatic.
Speaker 3: No one declared, Kavanaugh cleared, no one erased his photograph
Speaker 3: from the wall, But the certainty that had begun forming
Speaker 3: around the sale began to soften. The tensions in the
Speaker 3: business still mattered. The two hundred and fifty thousand dollars
Speaker 3: still mattered. Ownerships still mattered. Yet detectives were no longer
Speaker 3: asking only who benefited from Joseph being gone. They were
Speaker 3: asking who was present. That question narrowed the board. The
Speaker 3: sale remained a powerful narrative thread, but it was no
Speaker 3: longer the only thread pulling tight and as analysts reconstructed
Speaker 3: February fourth, minute by minute, a different set of numbers
Speaker 3: began to demand attention. A twenty eight p m. A
Speaker 3: phone call not answered, the file shifted again. By the
Speaker 3: time investigators reached the end of the business trail, they
Speaker 3: they were no longer looking at Earth inspired products in isolation.
Speaker 3: The sale, of the ownership, language, the administrative access, all
Speaker 3: of it remained relevant. But something quieter had begun to
Speaker 3: surface beneath the financial layers. It started with the calendar
Speaker 3: February fourth, twenty ten. Detectives rebuilt the day again, not
Speaker 3: from the perspective of web traffic or corporate filings, but
Speaker 3: from physical movement. Joseph's schedule, his meetings, his calls, his
Speaker 3: last confirmed face to face interaction that brought them back
Speaker 3: to lunch in Rancho Cucamonga. Joseph had met Charles Chase
Speaker 3: Merritt at a Chick fil at that afternoon. The two
Speaker 3: men had known each other for years. Their relationship was
Speaker 3: not limited to Earth inspired products. Merit built custom waterfalls
Speaker 3: and indoor water features. Joseph designed and sold them. The
Speaker 3: partnership was operational and frequent. They spoke often, they met often.
Speaker 3: The business depended on their coordination. The lunch itself was
Speaker 3: not dramatic. It was business. Receipts confirmed both men were present.
Speaker 3: Witnesses placed them there. Surveillance footage captured them entering and leaving.
Speaker 3: Detectives noted the duration of the meeting. They noted the
Speaker 3: time it ended. They noted that Joseph returned home afterward.
Speaker 3: That detail mattered. It placed Merit as the last verified
Speaker 3: in person contact outside the family. Investigators did not immediately
Speaker 3: treat that as suspicious business partners meet. They talked numbers,
Speaker 3: they part ways, But as February fourth was reconstructed minute
Speaker 3: by minute, the proximity of that meeting to the disappearance tightened.
Speaker 3: Phone records showed frequent communication between the two men earlier
Speaker 3: in the day. That pattern was not unusual. What stood
Speaker 3: out was the call that came later eight twenty eight
Speaker 3: p m. Joseph's phone dialed Merit. Merit did not answer.
Speaker 3: He later acknowledged seeing the call come through. He did
Speaker 3: not dispute that He said he was busy, He said
Speaker 3: he was tired. He said he'd already spoken to Joseph
Speaker 3: multiple times that day. Investigators logged the call as the
Speaker 3: last known outbound communication from Joseph's phone. They asked Meret
Speaker 3: to describe his movements that evening. He provided a timeline.
Speaker 3: He described where he was, He described who he was with.
Speaker 3: Detectives cross checked those statements against available records. Some elements aligned,
Speaker 3: others relied on memory rather than documentation. Unlike Cavanagh, Merit
Speaker 3: had been in southern California on February fourth, He had
Speaker 3: not been in Hawaii. He had not been twenty five
Speaker 3: hundred miles away. He had been within driving distance of Fallbrook.
Speaker 3: That fact alone did not elevate him above other possibilities.
Speaker 3: Geography creates opportunity. It does not create guilt, but investigators
Speaker 3: could not ignore physical proximity. They also revisited the custom
Speaker 3: water feature projects that two men were developing together. Contracts,
Speaker 3: pending deals, commission structures, payment schedules. Some invoices had been
Speaker 3: drafted but not yet settled. Certain deposits were anticipated but
Speaker 3: not yet cleared. Financial tension did not leap off the page.
Speaker 3: There was no obvious blow up in the paperwork, but
Speaker 3: small businesses often carry strain beneath surface optimism. Detectives examined
Speaker 3: whether Joseph had been fronting materials, whether Merit had been reimbursed,
Speaker 3: whether balances were owed in either direction. Nothing definitive emerged
Speaker 3: in the early passes. Still, the file again began to
Speaker 3: change shape. Kavanaugh represented digital leverage and post disappearance benefit.
Speaker 3: Merit represented proximity and immediacy. Investigators reviewed Merit's past interactions
Speaker 3: with Joseph in the days leading up to February fourth emails,
Speaker 3: text messages, voicemails. The tone was business like. There was
Speaker 3: no recorded argument, no documented threat, no abrupt severing ties.
Speaker 3: The lunch meeting at Chick fil A remained ordinary on
Speaker 3: its face, but the eight twenty eight p m call
Speaker 3: would not leave the board. Detectives asked themselves a narrow question,
Speaker 3: if Joseph felt the need to call Merit that evening,
Speaker 3: what prompted a follow up to lunch? A clarification A
Speaker 3: problem HM They did not know. What they did know
Speaker 3: was that after that call, Joseph's phone went dark. The
Speaker 3: Desert Graves had introduced homicide. The business sale had introduced motive.
Speaker 3: Now the timeline introduced presents. Investigators did not shift their
Speaker 3: full weight away from Cavanagh. The struggle for business control
Speaker 3: still carried logic, but the circle tightened. They began overlaying
Speaker 3: Merrit's movements with cell tower data from the high desert
Speaker 3: region north of Victorville. They examined tower pins in the
Speaker 3: days immediately following February fourth. They mapped them geographically. Some
Speaker 3: data points placed Merrit's phone within a broad swath of
Speaker 3: the high desert. The coverage area was not precise. It
Speaker 3: did not put him at the grave site. It placed
Speaker 3: him somewhere within a range of multiple towers that served
Speaker 3: a wide rural region. The ambiguity neither cleared nor condemned.
Speaker 3: But the desert had already yielded the McStay family's corpses,
Speaker 3: and now Merritt's phone had touched the same general terrain.
Speaker 3: The shift in focus was not loud, It was methodical,
Speaker 3: and it centered on February fourth. Detectives pulled Merrit's bank
Speaker 3: records alongside Joseph's. They charted transfers, deposits, withdrawals and patterns
Speaker 3: that predated February fourth. Small business finances often move in
Speaker 3: uneven bursts, vendor payments, contractor checks, material purchases. Detectives were
Speaker 3: not looking for volatility alone. They were looking for timing.
Speaker 3: What drew attention was not a single dramatic transaction, but
Speaker 3: the rhythm of activity. Immediately after the disappearance, Joseph's accounts
Speaker 3: stopped moving. Merits did not. That fact, by itself meant
Speaker 3: little Merritt had his own household, his own expenses. But
Speaker 3: investigators noticed that certain business related checks were deposited and
Speaker 3: certain communications with clients continued in the days and weeks
Speaker 3: after February fourth, as though the operation were still functioning.
Speaker 3: They asked a simple question, who had the authority to
Speaker 3: act on behalf of the custom water feature projects once
Speaker 3: Joseph was gone. Some checks bore Joseph's name, Some correspondence
Speaker 3: referenced ongoing installations. Detective scrutinized handwriting, endorsement patterns, email headers.
Speaker 3: They tracked IP addresses associated with account logins and online
Speaker 3: banking activity. They requested subpoenas where necessary. The financial trail
Speaker 3: did not explode, it accumulated in parallel. They returned to
Speaker 3: the cell data. The earlier high desert pings were broad
Speaker 3: an expanse that could encompass miles of scrub land and highway.
Speaker 3: Investigators refined the analysis. They plotted call details. Records from
Speaker 3: February fourth through February eighth were overlaid with known tower
Speaker 3: sectors and signal strengths. They compared those patterns against Merit's
Speaker 3: stated movements. There were moments where the phone appeared to
Speaker 3: travel north along the fifteen Freeway corridor. There were moments
Speaker 3: where it fell silent. There were moments where it reappeared
Speaker 3: within range of desert serving towers. None of it in
Speaker 3: isolation proved burial rural coverage can span wide distances, but
Speaker 3: when mapped against the eventual discovery site near Victorville, the
Speaker 3: proximity narrowed the margin. Detectives returned to the lunch meeting.
Speaker 3: Timeline receipts showed the afternoon encounter. Surveillance placed both men
Speaker 3: inside the Rancho Cucamonga Chick fil A. They walked out separately.
Speaker 3: Joseph's vehicle was later captured on neighborhood cameras near the
Speaker 3: Fallbrook home. Merit's truck appeared in separate footage in its
Speaker 3: own vicinity, but in investigators had begun reconstructing something else,
Speaker 3: the emotional temperature between the two men. They interviewed acquaintances again, contractors, friends,
Speaker 3: family members. Did Joseph express frustration, did he mention money?
Speaker 3: Did he hint at dissatisfaction? The responses were mixed. Business
Speaker 3: stress is common, conflict is not uncommon. But nothing in
Speaker 3: those interviews screamed rupture. What did stand out was familiarity.
Speaker 3: Merrit knew the mix Stay home he had visited. He
Speaker 3: knew the layout, He knew the rhythms of Joseph's work day.
Speaker 3: He knew when projects required late night calls and when
Speaker 3: materials were delivered. That knowledge did not implicate him. It
Speaker 3: contextualized access. Then came the digital overlap. Investigators compared timestamps
Speaker 3: of online activity tied to the custom water Feature business
Speaker 3: with Merit's known movements. There were logins that occurred at
Speaker 3: ten times Joseph's phone was inactive. There were communications with
Speaker 3: clients that suggested continuity, even as the McStay family had vanished.
Speaker 3: Who was keeping the machine running. When they re interviewed Merit,
Speaker 3: his tone shifted from cooperative to cautious. He answered questions,
Speaker 3: he did not refuse, but he began to parse language.
Speaker 3: More carefully. He framed his involvement as operational necessity. Projects
Speaker 3: could not simply halt clients needed responses. Materials had already
Speaker 3: been purchased. Investigators did not confront him with every data point.
Speaker 3: They asked about sequence, They asked about memory, They asked
Speaker 3: about why certain decisions were made on certain dates. The
Speaker 3: eight twenty eight pm missed call resurfaced in questioning. Merit
Speaker 3: acknowledged it again. He reiterated that he did not answer.
Speaker 3: He reiterated that he had spoken to Joseph earlier that day.
Speaker 3: Detectives pressed, did Joseph sound agitated at lunch, raised financial concerns?
Speaker 3: Did he mention plans for travel? Did he discuss Mexico?
Speaker 3: Merrit denied any indication of distress. As interviews concluded, the
Speaker 3: investigative board began to tilt. Kavanaugh still held financial motive
Speaker 3: through ownership questions and the business sale, but the sale
Speaker 3: occurred after Joseph had already vanished. It was an event
Speaker 3: that followed the disappearance. Merit's contact, by contrast, occurred on
Speaker 3: the day itself. Proximity in time, proximity in geography, continuity
Speaker 3: of business control. None of it declared guilt but all
Speaker 3: of it narrowed focus. By late February twenty fourteen, detectives
Speaker 3: had reassembled the timeline so many times that the edges
Speaker 3: had worn thin. February fourth was no longer just a date.
Speaker 3: It was broken into segments, morning activity, afternoon lunch, late day,
Speaker 3: phone traffic, evening silence. Each segment had been cross referenced
Speaker 3: with bank records, cell tower sectors, computer logins, and witness inches.
Speaker 3: When they laid Kavanaugh's movement beside the growing stack of
Speaker 3: digital evidence, something continued to miss align. The business transfer
Speaker 3: and the money it generated had looked like motive, but
Speaker 3: the timing of certain account activities and access points did
Speaker 3: not require him to be anywhere near Fallbrook. The Hawaii
Speaker 3: travel documentation, once created as a soft alibi, hardened under verification.
Speaker 3: Airline manifests, matched lodging records, matched phone data matched. The
Speaker 3: control theories, still explained the sale. It did not explain
Speaker 3: the desert. Investigators zeroed in on merit. They revisited the
Speaker 3: cell data with updated mapping software, refining sector ranges and
Speaker 3: narrowing down the geographic footprint of February sixth activity. Two
Speaker 3: days after the mixdays disappeared, the tower. Hits placed Merrit's
Speaker 3: phone in the high Desert region, in proximity to the
Speaker 3: area where the graves would eventually be found. The margin
Speaker 3: of error had shrunk. It was no longer a broad
Speaker 3: regional sweep. It was specific enough to draw a circle.
Speaker 3: They overlaid that circle with merits known associations. He had
Speaker 3: family in the desert, he had grown up familiar with
Speaker 3: portions of the terrain. He did not dispute being in
Speaker 3: the region that weekend, but his explanations varied in detail
Speaker 3: over time. Detectives logged each version. Meanwhile, the financial review deepened.
Speaker 3: Nine checks written from Joseph's business accounts after February fourth
Speaker 3: were examined line by line. The metadata within the accounting
Speaker 3: software showed creation dates that did not match the handwritten
Speaker 3: dates on the checks themselves. They had been backdated, Some
Speaker 3: were payable to Merit, others were payable to vendors to
Speaker 3: whom Merit owed money. I'm going to repeat that again.
Speaker 3: Metadata within the accounting software showed creation dates for nine
Speaker 3: checks that did not match the handwritten dates on the
Speaker 3: checks themselves. They had been backdated, Some were payable to Merit,
Speaker 3: and some were payable to vendors to whom Merit owed money.
Speaker 3: These were checks written to appear as though they had
Speaker 3: been created before Joseph's disappearance, but the software showed that
Speaker 3: they had been created afterward. This suggested not just access
Speaker 3: to Joseph's accounting software, but active manipulation, and investigators subpoenaed
Speaker 3: phone records connected to customer service calls placed to the
Speaker 3: accounting software provider, where a representative recalled a man identifying
Speaker 3: himself as Joseph McStay, requesting deletion of the company account.
Speaker 3: The caller could not provide the correct passcode, and so
Speaker 3: the request was denied. Ultimately, it was shown that the
Speaker 3: call originated from a phone associated with Chase Merit. Then,
Speaker 3: when investigators placed the sledge dge hammer recovered from the
Speaker 3: graves into evidence inventory, its three pound weight and blunt
Speaker 3: face became part of the forensic equation. The tool had
Speaker 3: been buried with the family. The burial site showed familiarity
Speaker 3: with the desert landscape, shallow graves dug in terrain that
Speaker 3: did not draw casual foot traffic. That familiarity, too, narrowed
Speaker 3: the field because that familiarity was something that Chase Merit
Speaker 3: was known to have having grown up in the region
Speaker 3: and having family there still and so finally, by October
Speaker 3: twenty fourteen, detectives believed that cumulative evidence had crossed the
Speaker 3: necessary threshold. They presented their case to the District Attorney's office.
Speaker 3: Financial fraud, post disappearance activity, desert cell data accounting manipulation,
Speaker 3: the mist call, the lunch meeting, the continuity of business control,
Speaker 3: the geographic overlap with the burial site. On November umber fifth,
Speaker 3: twenty fourteen, Charles Chase Merritt was arrested and charged with
Speaker 3: four counts of murder in the deaths of Joseph McStay,
Speaker 3: Summer Mixday, Jeanny McStay, and Joseph McStay Junior. There was
Speaker 3: no press conference declaring victory, there was no public certainty.
Speaker 3: There was a booking photo and a transport And please
Speaker 3: do tune in next week for the conclusion of the
Speaker 3: McStay family murders, where we'll talk about the trial, the outcome,
Speaker 3: and doubts that still remain. And again, if you've enjoyed
Speaker 3: the show, please do tell your friends, tell your family,
Speaker 3: tell anyone you know or happen to run into who
Speaker 3: likes a true crime podcast to listen. I sure do
Speaker 3: appreciate your efforts and I will see you here again
Speaker 3: next Thursday, February nineteenth, for the conclusion of the McStay
Speaker 3: family murders. I'm Zevan Odleberg and this has been kind
Speaker 3: of murdery.
Speaker 1: If you like the show, please subscribe, review and tell
Speaker 1: your friends. You can find us on social media at
Speaker 1: Kinamurdery or email at Kinomurtery at gmail dot com.
Podbean